Literature DB >> 19961281

Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: clinico-pathological presentation and survival outcomes.

Siriwan Tangjitgamol1, Jitti Hanprasertpong, Sumonmal Manusirivithaya, Virach Wootipoom, Thaovalai Thavaramara, Rakchai Buhachat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinico-pathological features, treatment, survival, and prognostic factors of patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors.
DESIGN: Descriptive study.
SETTING: Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical College and Vajira Hospital and Prince of Songkla University. POPULATION: Malignant ovarian germ cell tumor patients treated between January 1996 and December 2007.
METHODS: Clinico-pathological data were collected. Patients with malignant tumors arising from benign cystic teratoma were excluded. Survival and potential prognostic factors were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinico-pathological features, survival.
RESULTS: One hundred and thirty patients were identified. The median age was 21 years (range, 4-44 years). The most common complaint was pelvic or abdominal mass (63%). Primary surgery was performed by a gynecologic oncologist in only 39.2% of cases. More than half (64.2%) had early stage disease (stages I-II) and the majority had conservative surgery (73.1%). The most common histopathology was dysgerminoma. Of 124 patients with available follow-up data, 22 did not receive adjuvant treatment; 1 had whole abdominal radiation; and 101 had chemotherapy. Of 89 patients who were evaluable for responses, 4 patients had progressive disease while 85 had complete response. The five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 82.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 75.4-89.5%)] and 92.4% (95% CI, 87.6-97.2%), respectively. Only preoperative tumor marker elevation was a significant poor prognostic factor for PFS.
CONCLUSIONS: Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors have a good prognosis with conservative surgical treatment. Chemotherapy is important. Elevated preoperative serum tumor markers are a poor prognostic factor for PFS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19961281     DOI: 10.3109/00016340903443684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current Strategy for the Treatment of Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors: Role of Extensive Surgery.

Authors:  Jin Li; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-08

2.  Disparities in fertility-sparing surgery in adolescent and young women with stage I ovarian dysgerminoma.

Authors:  Laura L Stafman; Ilan I Maizlin; Matthew Dellinger; Kenneth W Gow; Melanie Goldfarb; Jed G Nuchtern; Monica Langer; Sanjeev A Vasudevan; John J Doski; Adam B Goldin; Mehul Raval; Elizabeth A Beierle
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Advanced ovarian dysgerminoma infiltrating both ovaries and uterus in a 7-year-old girl.

Authors:  Nexhmi Hyseni; Sadik Llullaku; Hysni Jashari; Kaltrina Zahiti; Fjolla Hyseni; Fisnik Kurshumliu; Lumturije Luci; Fehim Muqolli; Antigona Hasani
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol Med       Date:  2014-02-23

Review 4.  Diagnostic, Prognostic and Predictive Markers in Pediatric Germ Cell Tumors-Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Michalina Jezierska; Ada Gawrychowska; Joanna Stefanowicz
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21

5.  Ovarian dysgerminoma detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT technique: A case report.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Yaqi Feng; Wenli Dai; Qinxue Pu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.