Literature DB >> 19960688

Irritancy and repellency behavioral responses of three strains of Aedes aegypti exposed to DDT and alpha-cypermethrin.

Kanutcharee Thanispong1, Nicole L Achee, Michael J Bangs, John P Grieco, Wannapa Suwonkerd, Atchariya Prabaripai, Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap.   

Abstract

This study quantified both contact irritancy and noncontact repellency behavioral responses of three strains of Aedes aegypti (L.) (one long-term colony and two F1-F2 generation field-caught strains) to field application rates of DDT (2 g/m2) and alpha-cypermethrin (ACyp) (0.025 g/m2) by using an excito-repellency test chamber. The colony The colony strain (USDA) was completely susceptible to DDT and ACyp. One field strain was collected from Chiang Mai (CM) Province, northern Thailand, and was characterized as tolerant (reduced susceptibility) to DDT and completely susceptible to ACyp. The second field strain, collected from Kanchanaburi (KAN) Province, western Thailand, was highly resistant to DDT but fully susceptible to ACyp. All three strains exhibited marked irritancy to contact with ACyp, with more pronounced escape responses occurring in the two field strains. With DDT, the KAN strain demonstrated the lowest escape response during both contact and noncontact trials, whereas a greater response was seen in trials conducted with CM and USDA strains. With exposure to ACyp, repellency was less profound than irritancy but still resulted in a significant escape response compared with paired controls without insecticide (P < 0.05). DDT elicited both irritancy and repellency responses but comparably greater spatial repellency than ACyp. Findings indicate ACyp functions primarily as a strong contact irritant, whereas DDT functions as a relatively strong noncontact repellent in the strains tested. The higher the degree of physiological resistance to DDT, the greater the apparent suppression of both behavioral avoidance responses. Most importantly, observations using susceptible, tolerant, and resistant Ae. aegypti strains show that behavioral responses that can interrupt human-vector contact still occur regardless of degree of physiological susceptibility to compounds tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19960688     DOI: 10.1603/033.046.0622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  12 in total

1.  Behavioral Action of Deltamethrin and Cypermethrin in Pyrethroid-Resistant Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): Implications for Control Strategies in Thailand.

Authors:  Sunaiyana Sathantriphop; Pungasem Paeporn; Phubeth Ya-Umphan; Pongsakorn Mukkhun; Kanutcharee Thanispong; Chitti Chansang; Michael J Bangs; Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap; Krajana Tainchum
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Effects of irritant chemicals on Aedes aegypti resting behavior: is there a simple shift to untreated "safe sites"?

Authors:  Hortance Manda; Luana M Arce; Tarra Foggie; Pankhil Shah; John P Grieco; Nicole L Achee
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2011-07-26

3.  Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India.

Authors:  Sreehari Uragayala; Raghavendra Kamaraju; Satyanarayana Tiwari; Sushanta Kumar Ghosh; Neena Valecha
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.979

4.  Determining airborne concentrations of spatial repellent chemicals in mosquito behavior assay systems.

Authors:  Nicholas J Martin; Philip A Smith; Nicole L Achee; Gerald T DeLong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessing the combined effects of household type and insecticide effectiveness for kala-azar vector control using indoor residual spraying: a case study from North Bihar, India.

Authors:  Rakesh Mandal; Vijay Kumar; Shreekant Kesari; Pradeep Das
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Contact irritant responses of Aedes aegypti Using sublethal concentration and focal application of pyrethroid chemicals.

Authors:  Hortance Manda; Pankhil Shah; Suppaluck Polsomboon; Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap; Fanny Castro-Llanos; Amy Morrison; Roxanne G Burrus; John P Grieco; Nicole L Achee
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2013-02-28

Review 7.  Review of insecticide resistance and behavioral avoidance of vectors of human diseases in Thailand.

Authors:  Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap; Michael J Bangs; Wannapa Suwonkerd; Monthathip Kongmee; Vincent Corbel; Ratchadawan Ngoen-Klan
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Host-seeking activity of a Tanzanian population of Anopheles arabiensis at an insecticide treated bed net.

Authors:  Josephine E A Parker; Natalia C Angarita Jaimes; Katherine Gleave; Fabian Mashauri; Mayumi Abe; Jackline Martine; Catherine E Towers; David Towers; Philip J McCall
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Pyrethroid insecticides maintain repellent effect on knock-down resistant populations of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.

Authors:  Natalie M Bowman; Kristin Akialis; Grayson Cave; Roberto Barrera; Charles S Apperson; Steven R Meshnick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Experimental hut to study the indoor behaviour and effects of insecticide-treated bednets on phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae).

Authors:  Olga Lucía Cabrera; Erika Santamaría; Raúl Hernando Pardo
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.