Literature DB >> 19960667

ProactiveVector control strategies and improved monitoring and evaluation practices for dengue prevention.

Lars Eisen1, Barry J Beaty, Amy C Morrison, Thomas W Scott.   

Abstract

Despite tremendous efforts by public health organizations in dengue-endemic countries, it has proven difficult to achieve effective and sustainable control of the primary dengue virus vector Aedes aegypti (L.) and to effectively disrupt dengue outbreaks. This problem has multiple root causes, including uncontrolled urbanization, increased global spread of dengue viruses, and vector and dengue control programs not being provided adequate resources. In this forum article, we give an overview of the basic elements of a vector and dengue control program and describe a continuous improvement cyclical model to systematically and incrementally improve control program performance by regular efforts to identify ineffective methods and inferior technology, and then replacing them with better performing alternatives. The first step includes assessments of the overall resource allocation among vector/dengue control program activities, the efficacy of currently used vector control methods, and the appropriateness of technology used to support the program. We expect this will reveal that 1) some currently used vector control methods are not effective, 2) resource allocations often are skewed toward reactive vector control measures, and 3) proactive approaches commonly are underfunded and therefore poorly executed. Next steps are to conceptualize desired changes to vector control methods or technologies used and then to operationally determine in pilot studies whether these changes are likely to improve control program performance. This should be followed by a shift in resource allocation to replace ineffective methods and inferior technology with more effective and operationally tested alternatives. The cyclical and self-improving nature of the continuous improvement model will produce locally appropriate management strategies that continually are adapted to counter changes in vector population or dengue virus transmission dynamics. We discuss promising proactive vector control approaches and the continued need for the vector and dengue control community to incorporate emerging technologies and to partner with academia, business and the community-at-large to identify new solutions that reduce dengue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19960667     DOI: 10.1603/033.046.0601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  39 in total

1.  Exploiting mosquito sugar feeding to detect mosquito-borne pathogens.

Authors:  Sonja Hall-Mendelin; Scott A Ritchie; Cheryl A Johansen; Paul Zborowski; Giles Cortis; Scott Dandridge; Roy A Hall; Andrew F van den Hurk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Challenges and future perspective for dengue vector control in the Western Pacific Region.

Authors:  Moh Seng Chang; Eva Maria Christophel; Deyer Gopinath; Rashid Md Abdur; Other Vectorborne; Parasitic Diseases
Journal:  Western Pac Surveill Response J       Date:  2011-06-30

3.  The cost of routine Aedes aegypti control and of insecticide-treated curtain implementation.

Authors:  Alberto Baly; Steffen Flessa; Marilys Cote; Thirapong Thiramanus; Veerle Vanlerberghe; Elci Villegas; Somchai Jirarojwatana; Patrick Van der Stuyft
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Pathogenicity of some hypocrealean fungi to adult Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Renan Nunes Leles; Nathalia Almeida Sousa; Luiz Fernando Nunes Rocha; Adelair Helena Santos; Heloisa Helena Garcia Silva; Christian Luz
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Towards a Casa Segura: a consumer product study of the effect of insecticide-treated curtains on Aedes aegypti and dengue virus infections in the home.

Authors:  María Alba Loroño-Pino; Julián E García-Rejón; Carlos Machain-Williams; Salvador Gomez-Carro; Guadalupe Nuñez-Ayala; Maria del Rosario Nájera-Vázquez; Arturo Losoya; Lyla Aguilar; Karla Saavedra-Rodriguez; Saul Lozano-Fuentes; Meaghan K Beaty; William C Black; Thomas J Keefe; Lars Eisen; Barry J Beaty
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  Detection of dengue virus NS1 antigen in infected Aedes aegypti using a commercially available kit.

Authors:  Natalia V Voge; Irma Sánchez-Vargas; Carol D Blair; Lars Eisen; Barry J Beaty
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  Testing the impact of virus importation rates and future climate change on dengue activity in Malaysia using a mechanistic entomology and disease model.

Authors:  C R Williams; B S Gill; G Mincham; A H Mohd Zaki; N Abdullah; W R W Mahiyuddin; R Ahmad; M K Shahar; D Harley; E Viennet; A Azil; A Kamaluddin
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 8.  Need for an efficient adult trap for the surveillance of dengue vectors.

Authors:  N Sivagnaname; K Gunasekaran
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  The effects of city streets on an urban disease vector.

Authors:  Corentin M Barbu; Andrew Hong; Jennifer M Manne; Dylan S Small; Javier E Quintanilla Calderón; Karthik Sethuraman; Víctor Quispe-Machaca; Jenny Ancca-Juárez; Juan G Cornejo del Carpio; Fernando S Málaga Chavez; César Náquira; Michael Z Levy
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Lessons from malaria control to help meet the rising challenge of dengue.

Authors:  Katherine L Anders; Simon I Hay
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 25.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.