Literature DB >> 19960397

Evaluation of malignant liver tumors: biphasic MS-CT versus quantitative contrast harmonic imaging ultrasound.

D-A Clevert1, E-M Jung, K F Stock, S Weckbach, S Feuerbach, M Reiser, F Jung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It was the aim of our study to establish the extent to which contrast enhancement with SonoVue(R) in combination with quantitative evaluation of contrast-medium dynamics facilitates the detection of malignant hepatic tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with histologically confirmed malignant or benign hepatic tumors (maximum size 5 cm) were analyzed. We used a high-end ultrasound machine (Logic 9, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA), with a multifrequency curved array transducer (2.5 - 4 MHz), Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (bolus injection 2.4 mL SonoVue(R)) was carried out with the intermittent breath-holding technique. Native vascularization was analyzed with power Doppler sonography. The contrast-enhanced dynamic ultrasound investigation was carried out with contrast harmonic imaging in the true detection mode during the arterial, portal venous and late phases. The mechanical index was set at 0.15. Perfusion analysis was performed by post-processing of the raw data (time intensity curve [TIC] analysis). Biphasic 16- or 64-slice multislice computed tomography served as reference method in nearly all cases.
RESULTS: One hundred patients with 59 malignant (43 colon, 5 breast, 2 endocrine metastases, 7 hepatocellular carcinomas and 2 kidney cancers) and 41 benign (12 circumscribed fatty changes, 2 abscesses, 7 focal nodular hyperplasias, 5 complicated cysts and 15 hemangiomas) tumors were included. The CT classification was true positive in 71 of 92 patients, false negative in 8 cases, and in 13 cases no final diagnosis was possible; sensitivity was 96.7 % and specificity was 71.4 % for CT. The quantitative contrast harmonic imaging ultrasound classification was true positive in 98 of 100 patients and false negative in 2 cases; the sensitivity was 98.6 % and the specificity was 96.6 %. The Fisher test showed a significant difference at p < 0.05. No investigator-dependency was noted.
CONCLUSION: In our study contrast-enhanced ultrasound was more accurate than multislice computed tomography in the prediction of malignancy and benignity of liver tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19960397     DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0044-2771            Impact factor:   2.000


  10 in total

1.  [Summary of technical principles of contrast sonography and future perspectives].

Authors:  C Greis
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  [Contrast-enhanced sonography. Therapy control of radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma].

Authors:  E M Jung; W Uller; C Stroszczynski; D-A Clevert
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  [Latest developments in ultrasound of the liver].

Authors:  D-A Clevert; A Helck; P M Paprottka; F Schwarz; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Sublingual Nodules: Diagnostic Markers of Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xue Yang; Cui-Hong Zhu; Rui Cao; Jian Hao; Xiong-Zhi Wu
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 1.978

5.  First indicators of relapse in breast cancer: evaluation of the follow-up program at our hospital.

Authors:  Yoshinari Ogawa; Katsumi Ikeda; Tetsuo Izumi; Shiho Okuma; Makoto Ichiki; Tetsuro Ikeya; Jyunya Morimoto; Yukio Nishiguchi; Teruyuki Ikehara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Tin Nadarevic; Vanja Giljaca; Agostino Colli; Mirella Fraquelli; Giovanni Casazza; Damir Miletic; Davor Štimac
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-06

Review 7.  [Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the liver : Critical evaluation of use in clinical routine diagnostics].

Authors:  K Müller-Peltzer; J Rübenthaler; M Reiser; D-A Clevert
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for surveillance of choroidal carcinoma patients: features of liver metastasis arising several years after treatment of the primary tumor.

Authors:  Enrico N De Toni; Eike Gallmeier; Christoph J Auernhammer; Dirk-Andrè Clevert
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2011-07-09

9.  Regional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography (CEUS) Characteristics of Breast Cancer and Correlation with Microvessel Density (MVD).

Authors:  Xiaoling Leng; Guofu Huang; Fucheng Ma; Lanhui Yao
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-07-14

10.  Serological diagnosis of liver metastasis in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Rui Cao; Li-Ping Wang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.248

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.