Literature DB >> 1995973

Medicare Peer Review Organization preprocedure review criteria. An analysis of criteria for three procedures.

S E Kellie1, J T Kelly.   

Abstract

The Medicare Peer Review Organization (PRO) program includes preprocedure review using explicit criteria to assess the appropriateness of specific procedures. This study evaluates the variability in the PRO preprocedure criteria for the three procedures most frequently reviewed by PROs: carotid endarterectomy, cataract removal, and cardiac pacemaker implants. In August 1989, the PRO review criteria were received from the Health Care Financing Administration. To provide a reference point for reviewing the PRO criteria, national practice guidelines for these three procedures were identified. Wide variability was demonstrated in the PRO procedure-specific carotid endarterectomy and cataract removal review criteria among PROs, and the criteria differed significantly from the identified practice guidelines. The criteria for cardiac pacemaker implants were somewhat less variable, and were based, to varying degrees, on practice guidelines developed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC). Greater attention is needed to improve the development of review criteria, including the use of relevant practice guidelines, to ensure that review criteria are optimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1995973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical guidelines: proliferation and medicolegal significance.

Authors:  B Hurwitz
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

2.  From adversary to partner: have quality improvement organizations made the transition?

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Melissa D A Carlson; William T Gallo; Jeanne Scinto; Miriam K Campbell; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  A Conceptual Framework for Appropriateness in Surgical Care: Reviewing Past Approaches and Looking Ahead to Patient-centered Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Zara Cooper; Puneet Sayal; Sarah K Abbett; Mark D Neuman; Elizabeth M Rickerson; Angela M Bader
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification.

Authors:  José Ma Quintana; Antonio Escobar; Inmaculada Aróstegui
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.