BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Perfusion imaging is widely used in stroke, but there are uncertainties with regard to the choice of arterial input function (AIF). Two important aspects of AIFs are signal-to-noise ratio and bolus-related signal drop, ideally close to 63%. We hypothesized that distal branches of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) provide higher quality of AIF compared with proximal branches. METHODS: Over a period of 3 months, consecutive patients with suspected stroke were examined in a 3-T MRI scanner within 24 hours of symptom onset. AIFs were selected manually in M1, M2, and M3 branches of the MCA contralateral to the suspected ischemia. Signal-to-noise ratio and bolus-related signal drop were analyzed. Perfusion maps were created for every patient and mean values at the insular level as well as relative ranges were compared. RESULTS: Mean age of 132 included patients (53 females) was 67.3 years (SD, 14.9) and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 0 to 6). For further analyses, 4 patients were excluded due to discontinuation of scanning or insufficient bolus arrival (signal drop <15%). Median signal-to-noise ratio was highest in M3 branches (36.41; IQR, 29.29 to 43.58). Median signal-to-noise ratio in M2 branches was intermediate (27.54; IQR, 20.78 to 34.00) and median signal-to-noise ratio in M1 was low (12.40; IQR, 9.11 to 17.15). Using AIFs derived from M1 and M2 branches of the MCA median signal drop was 77% (IQR, 72% to 82%) and 78% (IQR, 73% to 83%), respectively. Signal drop was significantly reduced when AIF was selected in M3 branches with a median of 72% (IQR, 63% to 77%; P<0.01). Highest variability of 3456 perfusion maps was found in those derived from M1. CONCLUSIONS: The level of AIF selection in the MCA has a major impact on reliability and even quantitative parameters of perfusion maps. For better comparison of perfusion maps, the AIF should be defined by selection of distal branches of the MCA contralateral to the suspected ischemia. In future trials involving perfusion imaging, the MCA segment used for the AIF should be specified.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Perfusion imaging is widely used in stroke, but there are uncertainties with regard to the choice of arterial input function (AIF). Two important aspects of AIFs are signal-to-noise ratio and bolus-related signal drop, ideally close to 63%. We hypothesized that distal branches of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) provide higher quality of AIF compared with proximal branches. METHODS: Over a period of 3 months, consecutive patients with suspected stroke were examined in a 3-T MRI scanner within 24 hours of symptom onset. AIFs were selected manually in M1, M2, and M3 branches of the MCA contralateral to the suspected ischemia. Signal-to-noise ratio and bolus-related signal drop were analyzed. Perfusion maps were created for every patient and mean values at the insular level as well as relative ranges were compared. RESULTS: Mean age of 132 included patients (53 females) was 67.3 years (SD, 14.9) and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 0 to 6). For further analyses, 4 patients were excluded due to discontinuation of scanning or insufficient bolus arrival (signal drop <15%). Median signal-to-noise ratio was highest in M3 branches (36.41; IQR, 29.29 to 43.58). Median signal-to-noise ratio in M2 branches was intermediate (27.54; IQR, 20.78 to 34.00) and median signal-to-noise ratio in M1 was low (12.40; IQR, 9.11 to 17.15). Using AIFs derived from M1 and M2 branches of the MCA median signal drop was 77% (IQR, 72% to 82%) and 78% (IQR, 73% to 83%), respectively. Signal drop was significantly reduced when AIF was selected in M3 branches with a median of 72% (IQR, 63% to 77%; P<0.01). Highest variability of 3456 perfusion maps was found in those derived from M1. CONCLUSIONS: The level of AIF selection in the MCA has a major impact on reliability and even quantitative parameters of perfusion maps. For better comparison of perfusion maps, the AIF should be defined by selection of distal branches of the MCA contralateral to the suspected ischemia. In future trials involving perfusion imaging, the MCA segment used for the AIF should be specified.
Authors: N D Forkert; P Kaesemann; A Treszl; S Siemonsen; B Cheng; H Handels; J Fiehler; G Thomalla Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Alexander Seiler; Nicholas P Blockley; Ralf Deichmann; Ulrike Nöth; Oliver C Singer; Michael A Chappell; Johannes C Klein; Marlies Wagner Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Chao Xu; Wolf U H Schmidt; Kersten Villringer; Peter Brunecker; Valerij Kiselev; Peter Gall; Jochen B Fiebach Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Anke Wouters; Søren Christensen; Matus Straka; Michael Mlynash; John Liggins; Roland Bammer; Vincent Thijs; Robin Lemmens; Gregory W Albers; Maarten G Lansberg Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Ayse Ceren Tanrıtanır; Kersten Villringer; Ivana Galinovic; Ulrike Grittner; Evgeniya Kirilina; Jochen B Fiebach; Arno Villringer; Ahmed A Khalil Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Kersten Villringer; Sascha Zimny; Ivana Galinovic; Christian H Nolte; Jochen B Fiebach; Ahmed A Khalil Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Alexander Seiler; Ralf Deichmann; Waltraud Pfeilschifter; Elke Hattingen; Oliver C Singer; Marlies Wagner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 3.240