Literature DB >> 19959510

Diffuse liver disease: strategies for hepatic CT and MR imaging.

Daniel T Boll1, Elmar M Merkle.   

Abstract

The liver plays several complex but essential roles in the metabolism of amino acids, carbohydrates, and lipids, as well as synthesis of proteins. The basic pathophysiology of diffuse parenchymal hepatic diseases usually represents a failure in one of these metabolic pathways. Specific parenchymal diseases can be categorized as storage, vascular, and inflammatory diseases. Cross-sectional hepatic imaging techniques, specifically multidetector computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, have roles in evaluation of diffuse liver disease. The prominent role of multidetector CT is primarily defined by its excellent morphologic visualization capabilities, in particular of diffuse or focal intrahepatic lesions as well as of anatomic relationships between the liver and adjacent organs. The variety of available multidetector CT scanners covers a huge spectrum of detector configurations ranging from equally sized and equally spaced detector arrays to asymmetric detector configurations, resulting in imaging protocols with unique parameters for almost each multidetector CT system. In addition to 64-detector row imaging, hepatic multidetector CT can be performed with emerging techniques such as dual-energy CT. Hepatic MR imaging has been proved to be a comprehensive modality for assessing the morphology and functional characteristics of the liver. Concurrent technical improvements as well as implementation of advanced imaging sequence designs permit high-quality examination of the liver with T1-, T2-, and diffusion-weighted pulse sequences. Three basic demands remain if MR imaging is chosen for hepatic imaging: to improve parenchymal contrast, to suppress respiratory motion, and to ensure complete anatomic coverage. Supplemental material available at http://radiographics.rsna.org/content/29/6/1591/suppl/DC1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19959510     DOI: 10.1148/rg.296095513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  23 in total

1.  Quantification of liver iron content with CT-added value of dual-energy.

Authors:  Michael A Fischer; Caecilia S Reiner; Dimitri Raptis; Olivio Donati; Robert Goetti; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  High liver density on CT imaging due to amiodarone toxicity.

Authors:  Philipp Pecnik; Verena Ranftl; Martin Windpessl
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 3.  [Modern CT and PET/CT imaging of the liver].

Authors:  J Klasen; T A Heusner; C Riegger; D Reichelt; J Kuhlemann; G Antoch; D Blondin
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  [Rational imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma. The challenge of multimodal diagnostic criteria].

Authors:  A Kircher; G Bongartz; E M Merkle; C J Zech
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  [Diffuse and vascular hepatic diseases].

Authors:  S Kreimeyer; L Grenacher
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  Expectations from imaging for pre-transplant evaluation of living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Tiffany Hennedige; Gopinathan Anil; Krishnakumar Madhavan
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-28

Review 7.  Quantification of liver iron with MRI: state of the art and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Yakir S Levin; Claude B Sirlin; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Monitoring the Progression of Chronic Liver Damage in Rats Using [18F]PBR06.

Authors:  Shuo Huang; Chao Li; Jun Guo; Linlin Zhang; Shuqi Wu; Hui Wang; Sheng Liang
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Quantification of hepatic steatosis with dual-energy computed tomography: comparison with tissue reference standards and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the ob/ob mouse.

Authors:  Nathan S Artz; Catherine D G Hines; Stephen T Brunner; Rashmi M Agni; Jens-Peter Kühn; Alejandro Roldan-Alzate; Guang-Hong Chen; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 10.  Other types of diffuse liver disease: is there a way to do it?

Authors:  Hilton Leao Filho; Camila Vilela de Oliveira; Natally Horvat
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.