Literature DB >> 19959488

A simple clinical model composed of ECG, shock index, and arterial blood gas analysis for predicting severe pulmonary embolism.

Ahmet Bircan1, Nuriye Karadeniz, Ahmet Ozden, Munire Cakir, Ercan Varol, Orhan Oyar, Mehmet Ozaydin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Objective diagnosis of severe pulmonary embolism (PE) is obligatory because of its considerable mortality. AIM: To assess the abilities of electrocardiography (ECG) score (sECG) and the newly generated scoring system composed of the scores obtained from arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis and shock index (SI) in addition to sECG in predicting severe PE.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The degree of pulmonary vascular obstruction (sPVO) and the right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) were determined with spiral computed tomography (CT) in 53 consequent patients with PE. Twelve-lead ECG taken within a day of PE event and ABG values were evaluated according to ECG scoring system and original Geneva system, respectively.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 62.6 ± 13.4 years. Right ventricular dysfunction, sPVO ≥ 50%, hypoxemia, and SI were present in 34 (64.2%), 27 (50.9%), 50 (94.3%), and 22 (41.5%) patients, respectively. The mean sECG, 5.9 ± 5.1, was correlated with sPVO, maximum diameter of right ventricle (RV), and right ventricle to left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio (r = .385, r = .415, and r = .329, respectively). The mean newly generated score was 10.9 ± 5.5 and correlated with sPVO, maximum diameter of RV, and RV/LV ratio (r = .394, r = .483, and r = .393, respectively). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses revealed that sECG ≥ 3.5, s (ECG + SI) ≥ 4.5, and s (ECG + SI + ABG) ≥ 9.5 predict the severe PE patients with 70.6%, 61.8%, 58.8% sensitivities and 52.6%, 63.2%, 73.7% specificities, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Adding the scores obtained from SI and ABG to the sECG enhances the specificity of sECG in predicting RVD (+) or severe PE patients, although a lesser degree decreasing in sensitivity may occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19959488     DOI: 10.1177/1076029609351877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost        ISSN: 1076-0296            Impact factor:   2.389


  7 in total

Review 1.  The value of electrocardiographic abnormalities in the prognosis of pulmonary embolism: a consensus paper.

Authors:  Geneviève C Digby; Piotr Kukla; Zhong-Qun Zhan; Carlos A Pastore; Ryszard Piotrowicz; Edgardo Schapachnik; Wojciech Zareba; Antonio Bayés de Luna; Piotr Pruszczyk; Adrian M Baranchuk
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Relationship between Thrombosis Risk Factors, Clinical Symptoms, and Laboratory Findings with Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis; a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Rama Bozorgmehr; Mehdi Pishgahi; Pegah Mohaghegh; Marziye Bayat; Parastou Khodadadi; Ahmadreza Ghafori
Journal:  Arch Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2019-07-23

3.  The use of the shock index to predict hemodynamic collapse in hypotensive sepsis patients: A cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Zohair Al Aseri; Mohammed Al Ageel; Mohammed Binkharfi
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2020-03-05

4.  The diagnostic capability of electrocardiography on the cardiogenic shock in the patients with acute myocarditis.

Authors:  Dan Yang; Qing Dai; Han Wu; Jianzhou Chen; Jingmei Zhang; Zhonghai Wei
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Accuracy of D-dimer:fibrinogen ratio to diagnose pulmonary thromboembolism in patients admitted to intensive care units.

Authors:  Shokoufeh Hajsadeghi; Scott R Kerman; Mojtaba Khojandi; Helen Vaferi; Roza Ramezani; Negar M Jourshari; Sayyed A J Mousavi; Hamidezar Pouraliakbar
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.167

Review 6.  Prognostic models in acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antoine Elias; Susan Mallett; Marie Daoud-Elias; Jean-Noël Poggi; Mike Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The value of shock index in prediction of cardiogenic shock developed during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Zhonghai Wei; Jian Bai; Qing Dai; Han Wu; Shuaihua Qiao; Biao Xu; Lian Wang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.298

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.