PURPOSE: In order to measure spatial resolution of a PET tomograph in clinical conditions, this study describes and validates a method based on the recovery coefficient, a factor required to compensate underestimation in measured radioactivity concentration for small structures. METHODS: In a PET image, the recovery factors of radioactive spheres were measured and their comparison with simulated recovery coefficients yielded the tomographic spatial resolution. Following this methodology, resolution was determined in different surrounding media and several conditions for reconstruction, including clinical conditions for brain PET studies. All spatial resolution values were compared with those obtained using classical methods with point and line sources. RESULTS: In each considered condition, spatial resolution of the PET image estimated using the recovery coefficient showed good agreement with classical methods measurements, validating the procedure. CONCLUSION: Measurement of the recovery coefficient provides an assessment of tomographic spatial resolution, particularly in clinical studies conditions. 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: In order to measure spatial resolution of a PET tomograph in clinical conditions, this study describes and validates a method based on the recovery coefficient, a factor required to compensate underestimation in measured radioactivity concentration for small structures. METHODS: In a PET image, the recovery factors of radioactive spheres were measured and their comparison with simulated recovery coefficients yielded the tomographic spatial resolution. Following this methodology, resolution was determined in different surrounding media and several conditions for reconstruction, including clinical conditions for brain PET studies. All spatial resolution values were compared with those obtained using classical methods with point and line sources. RESULTS: In each considered condition, spatial resolution of the PET image estimated using the recovery coefficient showed good agreement with classical methods measurements, validating the procedure. CONCLUSION: Measurement of the recovery coefficient provides an assessment of tomographic spatial resolution, particularly in clinical studies conditions. 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Kyoji Okita; Dara G Ghahremani; Doris E Payer; Chelsea L Robertson; Andy C Dean; Mark A Mandelkern; Edythe D London Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Rudolf A Werner; Harun Ilhan; Sebastian Lehner; László Papp; Norbert Zsótér; Imke Schatka; Dirk O Muegge; Mehrbod S Javadi; Takahiro Higuchi; Andreas K Buck; Peter Bartenstein; Frank Bengel; Markus Essler; Constantin Lapa; Ralph A Bundschuh Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Paul E Kinahan; Darrin W Byrd; Brian Helba; Kristen A Wangerin; Xiaoxiao Liu; Joshua R Levy; Keith C Allberg; Karthik Krishnan; Ricardo S Avila Journal: Tomography Date: 2018-03