Literature DB >> 19959039

Pancreatic necrosectomy: North American mortality is much lower than expected.

Purvi Y Parikh1, Henry A Pitt, Molly Kilbane, Thomas J Howard, Attila Nakeeb, C Max Schmidt, Keith D Lillemoe, Nicholas J Zyromski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this analysis was to explore the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to determine outcomes of patients undergoing debridement for pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis. Single-institution series suggest that the mortality of patients undergoing pancreatic necrosectomy has improved but remains at 15% to 20%. But no national data have been available for patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. In 2007, a CPT code specific for debridement of pancreatic necrosis became available. STUDY
DESIGN: The ACS-NSQIP Participant Use File was queried for all patients who had debridement of pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis (CPT code 48105) from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2007. Patient demographics, observed (O) and expected (E) morbidity and mortality, and indices (O/E) were evaluated. A multivariate stepwise logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of mortality.
RESULTS: During this 12-month period, data were accumulated on 161 patients. The mean age was 54 years; 71% were male; and 75% were Caucasian. The mean body mass index was 30.3 kg/m(2); 29% had diabetes; and 11% abused alcohol. Forty-two percent were transferred to NSQIP hospitals from other facilities. Overall morbidity was 62%, and 30-day mortality was 6.8%, but morbidity and mortality indices were 0.86 and 0.33, respectively. Increased age and blood urea nitrogen were independent predictors of mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that patients undergoing debridement for pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis at ACS-NSQIP hospitals provide a new North American sample and have better than predicted outcomes. We concluded that ACS-NSQIP is a powerful tool to assess contemporary outcomes of uncommon, high-risk procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19959039     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  9 in total

Review 1.  Management of pancreatic fluid collections: A comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Amy Tyberg; Kunal Karia; Moamen Gabr; Amit Desai; Rushabh Doshi; Monica Gaidhane; Reem Z Sharaiha; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Open pancreatic necrosectomy: indications in the minimally invasive era.

Authors:  Carlos Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Peri-operative blood transfusion and operative time are quality indicators for pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Henry A Pitt; Molly E Kilbane; Elijah Dixon; Francis R Sutherland; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Predictors of Clavien 4 Complications and Mortality After Necrosectomy: Analysis of the NSQIP Database.

Authors:  Nina Kolbe; Stephanie Bakey; Lisa Louwers; Dionne Blyden; Mathilda Horst; Anthony Falvo; Joe Patton; Ilan Rubinfeld
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Minimally invasive pancreatic necrosectomy; a technical pictorial review.

Authors:  Gregory C Makris; Teikchoon See; Andrew Winterbottom; Asif Jah; Nadeem Shaida
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  A comparison of the hospital costs of open vs. minimally invasive surgical management of necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  Edwin Beenen; Lisa Brown; Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis: how much is too much?

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Camilo Correa-Gallego; Thomas J Howard; Nicholas J Zyromski; Michael G House; Henry A Pitt; Atilla Nakeeb; Christian M Schmidt; Fatih Akisik; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Direct endoscopic necrosectomy versus step-up approach for walled-off pancreatic necrosis: comparison of clinical outcome and health care utilization.

Authors:  Nitin Kumar; Darwin L Conwell; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Five-year cohort study of open pancreatic necrosectomy for necotizing pancreatitis suggests it is a safe and effective operation.

Authors:  Shanmiao Gou; Jiongxin Xiong; Heshui Wu; Feng Zhou; Jing Tao; Tao Liu; Chunyou Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.