Literature DB >> 19959009

Molecular imaging (PET) of brain tumors.

Sandip Basu1, Abass Alavi.   

Abstract

Despite the recognized limitations of (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in brain tumor imaging due to the high background of normal gray matter, this imaging modality provides critical information for the management of patients with cerebral neoplasms with regard to the following aspects: (1) providing a global picture of the tumor and thus guiding the appropriate site for stereotactic biopsy, and thereby enhancing its accuracy and reducing the number of biopsy samples; and (2) prediction of biologic behavior and aggressiveness of the tumor, thereby aiding in prognosis. Another area, which has been investigated extensively, includes differentiating recurrent tumor from treatment-related changes (eg, radiation necrosis and postsurgical changes). Furthermore, FDG-PET has demonstrated its usefulness in differentiating lymphoma from toxoplasmosis in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome with great accuracy, and is used as the investigation of choice in this setting. Image coregistration with magnetic resonance imaging and delayed FDG-PET imaging are 2 maneuvers that substantially improve the accuracy of interpretation, and hence should be routinely employed in clinical settings. In recent years an increasing number of brain tumor PET studies has used other tracers (like labeled methionine, tyrosine, thymidine, choline, fluoromisonidazole, EF5, and so forth), of which positron-labeled amino acid analogues, nucleotide analogues, and the hypoxia imaging tracers are of special interest. The major advantage of these radiotracers over FDG is the markedly lower background activity in normal brain tissue, which allows detection of small lesions and low-grade tumors. The promise of the amino acid PET tracers has been emphasized due to their higher sensitivity in imaging recurrent tumors (particularly the low-grade ones) and better accuracy for differentiating between recurrent tumors and treatment-related changes compared with FDG. The newer PET tracers have also shown great potential to image important aspects of tumor biology and thereby demonstrate ability to forecast prognosis. The value of hypoxia imaging tracers (such as fluoromisonidazole or more recently EF5) is substantial in radiotherapy planning and predicting treatment response. In addition, they may play an important role in the future in directing and monitoring targeted hypoxic therapy for tumors with hypoxia. Development of optimal image segmentation strategy with novel PET tracers and multimodality imaging is an approach that deserves mention in the era of intensity modulated radiotherapy, and which is likely to have important clinical and research applications in radiotherapy planning in patients with brain tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19959009     DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2009.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am        ISSN: 1052-5149            Impact factor:   2.264


  15 in total

Review 1.  Rational chemical design of the next generation of molecular imaging probes based on physics and biology: mixing modalities, colors and signals.

Authors:  Hisataka Kobayashi; Michelle R Longmire; Mikako Ogawa; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET and MRI associations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic brain stem glioma: a report from the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium.

Authors:  Katherine A Zukotynski; Frederic H Fahey; Mehmet Kocak; Abass Alavi; Terence Z Wong; S Ted Treves; Barry L Shulkin; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Jeffrey R Geyer; Sridhar Vajapeyam; James M Boyett; Larry E Kun; Tina Young Poussaint
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Correlation between cerebral blood volume measurements by perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and two-year progression-free survival in gliomas.

Authors:  M V Spampinato; C Schiarelli; A Cianfoni; P Giglio; C T Welsh; S Bisdas; Z Rumboldt
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2013-08-27

Review 4.  The promise and pitfalls of positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography molecular imaging-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Joseph M Herman; Eric Ford
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.934

5.  National Electrical Manufacturers Association and Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Brain PET/CT Scanner.

Authors:  Kira S Grogg; Terrence Toole; Jinsong Ouyang; Xuping Zhu; Marc D Normandin; Quanzheng Li; Keith Johnson; Nathaniel M Alpert; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Role of glutamine in cancer: therapeutic and imaging implications.

Authors:  Kartik N Rajagopalan; Ralph J DeBerardinis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Current evidence base of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the clinical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: emerging significance of image segmentation and global disease assessment.

Authors:  Sandip Basu; Babak Saboury; Drew A Torigian; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Glioblastoma blood flow measured with stable xenon CT indicates tumor necrosis, vascularity, and brain invasion.

Authors:  Matthew Crocker; Samira Saadoun; Alexa Jury; Chris Jones; Stergios Zacharoulis; Samiwel Thomas; Reyer Zwiggelaar; Leslie R Bridges; B Anthony Bell; Marios C Papadopoulos
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 9.  Invited review--neuroimaging response assessment criteria for brain tumors in veterinary patients.

Authors:  John H Rossmeisl; Paulo A Garcia; Gregory B Daniel; John Daniel Bourland; Waldemar Debinski; Nikolaos Dervisis; Shawna Klahn
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 1.363

10.  A longitudinal magnetic resonance elastography study of murine brain tumors following radiation therapy.

Authors:  Y Feng; E H Clayton; R J Okamoto; J Engelbach; P V Bayly; J R Garbow
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.