OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the independent impact of field triage on treatment delay and long-term clinical outcome in a large contemporary, consecutive population of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). BACKGROUND: Reduction of treatment delay is crucial for patients with STEMI. METHODS: From January 2005 to July 2008, 1,437 STEMI patients were treated with pPCI at a single high-volume invasive center. We present the 1-year outcome in this observational registry study. RESULTS: A total of 616 patients were admitted by field triage and 821 by emergency departments. Baseline and angiographic variables were similar in the 2 populations. Patients admitted by field triage had a significantly shorter median door-to-balloon time compared with patients admitted by emergency department triage (83 min, interquartile range 67 to 100 min vs. 103 min, interquartile range 80 to 135 min; p<0.001). Door-to-balloon times of less than the recommended 90 min were achieved in 61% of field triage patients, but only in 36% of nonfield-triage patients (p<0.001). After adjustment for relevant baseline variables, patients admitted by field triage had a reduced risk of reaching the combined end point of all-cause mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction (hazard ratio: 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.46 to 0.97; p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that field triage of STEMI patients to pPCI significantly reduces treatment delay and improves outcome. These results emphasize the value of field triage as an important tool in the quest to improve clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the independent impact of field triage on treatment delay and long-term clinical outcome in a large contemporary, consecutive population of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). BACKGROUND: Reduction of treatment delay is crucial for patients with STEMI. METHODS: From January 2005 to July 2008, 1,437 STEMI patients were treated with pPCI at a single high-volume invasive center. We present the 1-year outcome in this observational registry study. RESULTS: A total of 616 patients were admitted by field triage and 821 by emergency departments. Baseline and angiographic variables were similar in the 2 populations. Patients admitted by field triage had a significantly shorter median door-to-balloon time compared with patients admitted by emergency department triage (83 min, interquartile range 67 to 100 min vs. 103 min, interquartile range 80 to 135 min; p<0.001). Door-to-balloon times of less than the recommended 90 min were achieved in 61% of field triage patients, but only in 36% of nonfield-triage patients (p<0.001). After adjustment for relevant baseline variables, patients admitted by field triage had a reduced risk of reaching the combined end point of all-cause mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction (hazard ratio: 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.46 to 0.97; p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that field triage of STEMI patients to pPCI significantly reduces treatment delay and improves outcome. These results emphasize the value of field triage as an important tool in the quest to improve clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI.
Authors: Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro; Angela López-Sainz; Armando Pérez de Prado; Carlos Cuellas; Ramón Calviño Santos; Norberto Alonso-Orcajo; Jorge Salgado Fernández; Jose Manuel Vázquez-Rodríguez; Maria López-Benito; Felipe Fernández-Vázquez Journal: World J Cardiol Date: 2014-06-26
Authors: Ahmad Alrawashdeh; Ziad Nehme; Brett Williams; Karen Smith; Angela Brennan; Diem T Dinh; Danny Liew; Jeffrey Lefkovits; Dion Stub Journal: Open Heart Date: 2021-05
Authors: Robert A Aertker; Colin M Barker; H Vernon Anderson; Ali E Denktas; Gregory M Giesler; Vinay R Julapalli; John F Ledoux; David E Persse; Stefano Sdringola; Mary T Vooletich; James J McCarthy; Richard W Smalling Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2011-11
Authors: S Postma; J H E Dambrink; M J de Boer; A T M Gosselink; J P Ottervanger; P C Koopmans; J M Ten Berg; H Suryapranata; A W J van 't Hof Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.380
Authors: Pria M D Nippak; Jodie Pritchard; Robin Horodyski; Candace J Ikeda-Douglas; Winston W Isaac Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Kyungil Park; Jong Sung Park; Young Rak Cho; Tae Ho Park; Moo Hyun Kim; Tae Hyun Yang; Doo Il Kim; Jung Hwan Kim; Yong Hwan Lee; Dong Won Lee; Jeongkee Seo; Geun Young Lee; Young Dae Kim Journal: Korean Circ J Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.243
Authors: Nobila Valentin Yameogo; André Samadoulougou; Georges Millogo; Koudougou Jonas Kologo; Karim Kombassere; Boubacar Jean Yves Toguyeni; Patrice Zabsonre Journal: Pan Afr Med J Date: 2012-12-30