Literature DB >> 19958856

The balloon pump-assisted coronary intervention study (BCIS-1): rationale and design.

Divaka Perera1, Rodney Stables, Jean Booth, Martyn Thomas, Simon Redwood.   

Abstract

Several observational studies have suggested that mortality and major complications after high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be reduced by elective insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). However, to date, this assertion has never been tested in a randomized trial, and as such, international guidelines do not provide formal recommendations for IABP use in this setting. The BCIS-1 is a randomized trial that addresses the hypothesis that elective IABP insertion before high-risk PCI will reduce major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) at hospital discharge or 28 days after index PCI, whichever occurs sooner. High risk is defined by the presence of severe left ventricular dysfunction as well as a large amount of myocardium at risk. Patients who are in cardiogenic shock, have a class I indication for IABP use, or have an absolute contraindication to IABP use will be excluded. Three hundred eligible patients will be randomized to receive elective IABP insertion or no planned IABP insertion. The findings of BCIS-1 are expected to define the role of balloon counterpulsation in high-risk PCI. Confirmation of the efficacy of elective IABP use may prompt review of the international guidelines, which are currently very restricted. In contrast, a neutral or adverse outcome with elective counterpulsation in these high-risk patients will allow evidence-based rationalization of the current disparity between guidelines and the frequent real-world use of elective IABP support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19958856     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  8 in total

1.  Intraaortic balloon pump: incidence and predictors of complications in the Florence registry.

Authors:  Serafina Valente; Chiara Lazzeri; Elena Crudeli; Marco Chiostri; Cristina Giglioli; Pasquale Bernardo; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  The assessment of ischaemic burden: validation of a functional jeopardy score against cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Shazia T Hussain; Geraint Morton; Kalpa De Silva; Roy Jogiya; Andreas Schuster; Matthias Paul; Divaka Perera; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Susanne Unverzagt; Michael Buerke; Antoinette de Waha; Johannes Haerting; Diana Pietzner; Melchior Seyfarth; Holger Thiele; Karl Werdan; Uwe Zeymer; Roland Prondzinsky
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-27

4.  What is the role of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction presenting without shock?

Authors:  Kalpa De Silva; Divaka Perera
Journal:  Heart Int       Date:  2012-02-06

5.  Is Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation Sufficient to Treat Patients in Cardiogenic Shock, Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Maria Paton; Lisa Ashton; Ian Pearson; Mohan Sivananthan
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2015-12-16

6.  Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry.

Authors:  Francesco Burzotta; Giulio Russo; Flavio Ribichini; Anna Piccoli; Domenico D'Amario; Lazzaro Paraggio; Leonardo Previ; Gabriele Pesarini; Italo Porto; Antonio Maria Leone; Giampaolo Niccoli; Cristina Aurigemma; Diana Verdirosi; Filippo Crea; Carlo Trani
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Circulatory support with larger volume intra-aortic balloon pump vs. standard volume or no-balloon pump during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. A randomised study.

Authors:  Aleksander Zeliaś; Wojciech Zajdel; Krzysztof Malinowski; Jolanta Geremek; Krzysztof Żmudka
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 1.426

8.  2D high resolution vs. 3D whole heart myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Muhummad Sohaib Nazir; Joy Shome; Adriana D M Villa; Matthew Ryan; Ziyan Kassam; Reza Razavi; Sebastian Kozerke; Tevfik F Ismail; Divaka Perera; Amedeo Chiribiri; Sven Plein
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 9.130

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.