Literature DB >> 19958152

Effect of previous open renal surgery and failed extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy on the performance and outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Berkan Resorlu1, Cengiz Kara, Cagri Senocak, Izzet Cicekbilek, Ali Unsal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the effects of previous open renal surgery and unsuccessful extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment on the performance and outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 410 consecutive PCNL procedures for renal calculi were performed at our institution from November 2006 to March 2009. Of these 410 patients, 86 (20.9%) with a history of failed SWL on the same side were categorized as group I, and 132 (32.2%) who had previous open renal surgery (+/-SWL) on the same kidney were categorized as group II. The remaining 192 patients (46.9%) without a history of SWL or open renal surgery comprised group III. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, operative findings, including operative time, time to access the collecting system, flouroscopy time, success rate, need for auxiliary treatments, and complications were documented in detail and compared in each group.
RESULTS: There were no differences between the three groups in age, sex, weight, and stone laterality. In the post-SWL group, mean stone burden was significantly lower than in groups II and III. Mean operative time, time to access the collecting system, fluoroscopic screening time, complication rates, nephrostomy removal times, and hospitalization times were similar in the each groups (P > 0.05 for each parameter). The stone-free rates after PCNL were 89.5% in group I; 87.1% in group II; and 88.5% in group III. These rates increased to 98.8%, 96.2%, and 96.8%, in groups I, II and III, respectively, after a second intervention (PCNL, SWL, or ureterorenoscopy).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study clearly demonstrates that PCNL with standard technique can be performed safely in patients with a history of open nephrolithotomy or SWL without a higher risk of complications and with a success rate similar to that of PCNL in patients with no previous intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19958152     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  15 in total

1.  Does previous stone treatment in children generate a disadvantage or just the opposite?

Authors:  Onur Telli; Perviz Haciyev; Seymur Karimov; Hasmet Sarici; Tolga Karakan; Berat Cem Ozgur; Arif Demirbas; Berkan Resorlu; Tarkan Soygur; Berk Burgu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Which factors may effect urinary leakage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Ayhan Dirim; Tahsin Turunc; Baris Kuzgunbay; Eray Hasirci; Mehmet Ilteris Tekin; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Does previous open renal surgery or percutaneous nephrolithotomy affect the outcomes and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Onur Kucuktopcu; Omer Sarılar; Mehmet Toptas; Abdulmuttalip Simsek; Zafer Gokhan Gurbuz; Mehmet Fatih Akbulut; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Factors affecting complications according to the modified Clavien classification in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Alireza Farzan; Hamidreza Baghani Aval; Ali Ghasemi; Elaheh Shahab; Seyednaser Seyed Esmaeili; Reza Motiee; Seyedeh Alaleh Motiei Langroodi; Mohadeseh Nemati; Aliakbar Allahkhah
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  The effects of previous open renal stone surgery types on PNL outcomes.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Onur Kucuktopcu; Burak Ucpinar; Omer Sarilar; Akif Erbin; Fatih Yanaral; Murat Sahan; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in new versus those patients with previous history of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy on ipsilateral side.

Authors:  Nadeem Iqbal; Sajid Iqbal; Nasir Zareen; Keron Akintola Ayodele Blair
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.340

7.  Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm.

Authors:  Mustafa Kirac; Ömer Faruk Bozkurt; Lutfi Tunc; Cagri Guneri; Ali Unsal; Hasan Biri
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones following failed extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: different performances and morbidities.

Authors:  Wen Zhong; Ting Gong; Liang Wang; Guohua Zeng; Wenqi Wu; Zhigang Zhao; Weide Zhong; Shaw P Wan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Salvage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Analysis of Outcomes following Initial Treatment Failure.

Authors:  Michael S Borofsky; Daniel A Wollin; Thanmaya Reddy; Ojas Shah; Dean G Assimos; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Factors Influencing the Duration of Urine Leakage following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Ugur Uyeturk; Adnan Gucuk; Eray Kemahli; Emine Dagistan; Mevlut Yildiz; Burak Yilmaz; Ahmet Metin
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2014-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.