Literature DB >> 1995805

Health promotion in small business: what works and what doesn't work.

J C Erfurt1, K Holtyn.   

Abstract

Wellness programs were tested in three sites, representing three different types of small businesses. The sites ranged in size from 296 to 5 employees. The program at each site included: 1) wellness screening, 2) referral to community physicians for high blood pressure or cholesterol, 3) on-site wellness programs, and 4) long-term follow-up counseling. At sites 2 and 3, the respective company paid the full cost of these services; at site 1, the company's financial support was limited to 50% of the cost of screening. Results showed that participation in screening was severely reduced in the third company, and participation in follow-up and wellness programs dropped to zero. In contrast, there was full participation in all facets of the program at the two sites that paid all costs. Twelve-month follow-up data showed improvements in blood pressure, cholesterol, cigarette smoking, weight control, and oxygen uptake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1995805     DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199101000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Med        ISSN: 0096-1736


  4 in total

Review 1.  Health promotion in small business: a systematic review of factors influencing adoption and effectiveness of worksite wellness programs.

Authors:  Kira McCoy; Kaylan Stinson; Kenneth Scott; Liliana Tenney; Lee S Newman
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  A qualitative examination of the role of small, rural worksites in obesity prevention.

Authors:  Cam Escoffery; Michelle C Kegler; Iris Alcantara; Mark Wilson; Karen Glanz
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Development of a community-wide cardiovascular risk reduction assessment tool for small rural employers in upstate New York.

Authors:  Ron Z Goetzel; Rivka C Liss-Levinson; Nanette Goodman; James X Kennedy
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Kennedy Space Center Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction Program evaluation.

Authors:  Kristine S Calderon; Charles Smallwood; David A Tipton
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.