Literature DB >> 19956518

A feasibility study of adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay (ATP-CRA) as a chemosensitivity test for lung cancer.

Shin Myung Kang1, Moo Suk Park, Joon Chang, Se Kyu Kim, Haeryoung Kim, Dong-Hwan Shin, Kyung Young Chung, Dae Joon Kim, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Sung Ho Choi, Jeongmi Kim, Eun Jin Yoon, Joo-Hang Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A chemosensitivity test can reflect the differences in responses of individual cancer patients to chemotherapeutic agents. The adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay (ATP-CRA) is an accurate method, which does not require a large amount of tissue specimen. So far, no studies have evaluated the utility of the ATP-CRA in Korea. Therefore, we investigated the clinical usefulness of the ATP-CRA in 53 patients with lung cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tumor tissues were obtained from bronchoscopic biopsies or surgical resections. The validity of ATP-CRA was assessed focusing on the success rate, experimental error level (intraassay mean coefficient of variation [CV]) and reproducibility.
RESULTS: The overall success rate of ATP-CRA was 90.6% (48/53). Normal cells were effectively eliminated from the tumor tissues with the use of ficoll gradient centrifugation and immunomagnetic separation, which was confirmed using loss of heterozygosity analysis of the 3p deletion. The mean CV of ATP assays was 10.5+/-4.6%. The reproducibility of ATP assays was 94+/-3.8%. The results of the ATP assays were reported to physicians within 7 days of specimen collection. More than 6 anticancer drugs were tested on the tumor specimens obtained from bronchoscopic biopsies.
CONCLUSION: The ATP-CRA is a stable, accurate and potentially practical chemosensitivity test in patients with lung cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATP-CRA; Chemosensitivity test; Lung cancer

Year:  2005        PMID: 19956518      PMCID: PMC2785914          DOI: 10.4143/crt.2005.37.4.223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1598-2998            Impact factor:   4.679


  20 in total

Review 1.  Individualizing chemotherapy for solid tumors--is there any alternative?

Authors:  I A Cree; C M Kurbacher
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.248

2.  The usefulness of the ATP assay with serum-free culture for chemosensitivity testing of gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  H Kawamura; K Ikeda; I Takiyama; M Terashima
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Comparison of MTT and ATP-based assays for the measurement of viable cell number.

Authors:  R D Petty; L A Sutherland; E M Hunter; I A Cree
Journal:  J Biolumin Chemilumin       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  Review of the efficacy of individualized chemotherapy selected by in vitro drug sensitivity testing for patients with cancer.

Authors:  P Cortazar; B E Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity of metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  I A Cree; M H Neale; N E Myatt; P G de Takats; P Hall; J Grant; C M Kurbacher; U Reinhold; K Neuber; R M MacKie; J Chana; P C Weaver; G G Khoury; C Sartori; P E Andreotti
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.248

6.  The ex vivo chemosensitivity profile of choroidal melanoma.

Authors:  N Myatt; I A Cree; C M Kurbacher; A J Foss; J L Hungerford; P N Plowman
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.248

7.  Correlation of the clinical response to chemotherapy in breast cancer with ex vivo chemosensitivity.

Authors:  I A Cree; C M Kurbacher; M Untch; L A Sutherland; E M Hunter; A M Subedi; E A James; J A Dewar; P E Preece; P E Andreotti; H W Bruckner
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.248

8.  The ATP assay is more sensitive than the succinate dehydrogenase inhibition test for predicting cell viability.

Authors:  Y Maehara; H Anai; R Tamada; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-03

9.  Chemosensitivity testing of human tumors using a microplate adenosine triphosphate luminescence assay: clinical correlation for cisplatin resistance of ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  P E Andreotti; I A Cree; C M Kurbacher; D M Hartmann; D Linder; G Harel; I Gleiberman; P A Caruso; S H Ricks; M Untch
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Chemosensitivity testing with highly purified fresh human tumour cells with the MTT colorimetric assay.

Authors:  H Yamaue; H Tanimura; T Tsunoda; M Tani; M Iwahashi; K Noguchi; M Tamai; T Hotta; K Arii
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Recent applications of chemosensitivity tests for colorectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Yong Sik Yoon; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Individualized tumor response testing for prediction of response to Paclitaxel and Cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jee Hyun Kim; Keun-Wook Lee; Yeul Hong Kim; Kyung Hee Lee; Do Youn Oh; Joonhee Kim; Sung Hyun Yang; Seock-Ah Im; Sung Ho Choi; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Correlation of Early Recurrence With In Vitro Adenosine Triphosphate Based Chemotherapy Response Assay in Pancreas Cancer With Postoperative Gemcitabine Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Joon Seong Park; Jae Keun Kim; Dong Sup Yoon
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  In vitro adenosine triphosphate based chemotherapy response assay in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Seulkee Park; Yanghee Woo; Hogeun Kim; Yong Chan Lee; Sungho Choi; Woo Jin Hyung; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.720

5.  Chemotherapy response assay test and prognosis for breast cancer patients who have undergone anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Anbok Lee; Woosung Lim; Byung-In Moon; Nam-Sun Paik; Suck-Hwan Koh; Jeong-Yoon Song
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.588

6.  ATP-based chemotherapy response assay in primary or recurrent ovarian and peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Maria Lee; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Hanbyoul Cho; Jae Hoon Kim; Young Tae Kim; Sunghoon Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  In Vitro Adenosine Triphosphate-Based Chemotherapy Response Assay as a Predictor of Clinical Response to Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hye Youn Kwon; Im-Kyung Kim; Jeonghyun Kang; Seung-Kook Sohn; Kang Young Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 8.  Benefits of functional assays in personalized cancer medicine: more than just a proof-of-concept.

Authors:  Christophe Bounaix Morand du Puch; Mathieu Vanderstraete; Stéphanie Giraud; Christophe Lautrette; Niki Christou; Muriel Mathonnet
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.556

9.  Heterogeneity of adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay in colorectal cancer--secondary publication.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Yoon Ah Park; Kang Young Lee; Seung-Kook Sohn
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Association between Chemotherapy-Response Assays and Subsets of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Gastric Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jee Youn Lee; Taeil Son; Jae-Ho Cheong; Woo Jin Hyung; Sung Hoon Noh; Choong-Bai Kim; Chung-Gyu Park; Hyoung-Il Kim
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.720

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.