Literature DB >> 19955599

[Laparoscopic radical cystectomy. The new gold standard for bladder carcinoma?].

Octavio A Castillo1, Gonzalo Vitagliano, Ivar Vidal-Mora.   

Abstract

SUMMARY
OBJECTIVES: The experience of a renowned Latin American laparoscopic center is reported and the differences with the open technique are thoroughly discussed.
METHODS: During a 7 year period a total of 85 laparoscopic cystectomies were performed; in 92%of the cases urinary diversion was performed extracorporeally. This accounted for: 14 anterior exanterations, 50 radical cystoprostatectomies, 7 radical cystectomies and 14 simple cystectomies. Male to female ratio was 3:1. Mean patient age was 63 years (range 29 to 83). Mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 28 kg/m2(range 20 to 47). Operative data and long term results are analyzed.
RESULTS: All 85 procedures were completed laparoscopically without need for conversion to open surgery. Orthotopic neobladder, Santiago pouch, Studer, Fontana and Le Bag were performed in 42, 13, 16, 12 and 1 case respectively. Ileal conduit, Indiana pouch and Mainz II were employed in 24, 10 and 9 cases respectively. All Mainz II were performed intracorporeally. Mean operative time and blood loss were 279 minutes (range 180 to 375) and 436 ml (range 50 to 1.500) respectively. A total of 8 patients (11%) presented perioperative complications: 5 vascular lesions, 2 eviscerations and 2 septicemias. Delayed complications were observed in 7 cases (9%); 3 urinary sepsis, 1 ureteral stenosis, 2 spontaneous ruptures and 1 mesenteric ischemia. Mean hospital stay was 8.8 days (range de 4 to 28). There was no operative mortality. Mean follow-up was 18 months (range 2 to 68 months). Ten patients (13%) presented disease progression and death.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical cystectomy is associated with diminished operative bleeding, time to oral intake and hospital stay. Though this is a reproducible technique it demands a very long learning curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19955599     DOI: 10.4321/s0004-06142009000900009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Esp Urol        ISSN: 0004-0614            Impact factor:   0.436


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current trends in minimally invasive reconstructive urology.

Authors:  I Belibasakis; G Kolostoumpis; K Makrygiannaki
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-11-05

2.  Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults.

Authors:  Bhavan Prasad Rai; Jasper Bondad; Nikhil Vasdev; Jim Adshead; Tim Lane; Kamran Ahmed; Mohammed S Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Khurshid Guru; Piotr L Chlosta; Omar M Aboumarzouk
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-24

3.  Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: neobladder or ileal conduit, debate still goes on.

Authors:  Omar M Aboumarzouk; Tomasz Drewa; Pawel Olejniczak; Piotr L Chlosta
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-04-17

4.  A Novel Neobladder-Urethral Drag-and-Bond Anastomosis Technique During Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy for Ileal Orthotopic Neobladder: Surgical Technique and Initial Research.

Authors:  Zhaojun Yu; Jianbiao Huang; Huanhuan Deng; Zhihua Zeng; Leihong Deng; Xiangda Xu; Haichao Chao; Tao Zeng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Outcome of Mainz II Pouch Urinary Diversion after Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Our Experience.

Authors:  Stephen Odunayo Ikuerowo; Olufemi O Ojewuyi; Muftau Jimoh Bioku; Abimbola Ayodeji Abolarinwa; Olufunmilade Akinfolarin Omisanjo
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.