Literature DB >> 19955327

Comparative evaluation of the dustiness of industrial minerals according to European standard EN 15051, 2006.

Ingeborg Pensis1, Joyce Mareels, Dirk Dahmann, David Mark.   

Abstract

A range of industrial minerals was tested using the rotating drum and the continuous drop methods, the two methods proposed by the published European standard EN 15051 [CEN. (2006) EN 15051 Workplace atmospheres-measurement of the dustiness of bulk materials-requirements and test methods. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization], to evaluate and compare their dustiness. The assessment of bulk materials dustiness can help to develop less dusty products and to reduce dust exposure to the workers by improving the processing of minerals. The European standard EN 15051 (CEN, 2006) proposes a classification system that was developed with the intention to assist in the labelling of products in the future. This paper presents a comparison of both test methods in classifying industrial minerals. The correlation between the dustiness measured by the two methods for the inhalable and respirable fractions is given. The results show there is no unambiguous dependence of the dustiness on the grain size of an industrial mineral. Although dustiness can significantly be affected by product moisture, the influence of this parameter is not studied in detail as the industrial minerals were tested in the conditions they are sold, as the standard requires. Especially, the classification of substances with respect to different classes of dustiness was found to be problematic, as the two methods are by no means yielding identical classification groups for all the substances. In any use of the standard (EN 15051; CEN, 2006) for labelling purposes, a revision of the present classification system provided in the standard is required for industrial minerals.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19955327     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mep077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  8 in total

1.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of the Venturi Dustiness Tester.

Authors:  Prahit Dubey; Urmila Ghia; Leonid A Turkevich
Journal:  Powder Technol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.134

2.  A novel device for measuring respirable dustiness using low-mass powder samples.

Authors:  Patrick T O'Shaughnessy; Mitchell Kang; Daniel Ellickson
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Organic dust toxic syndrome at a grass seed plant caused by exposure to high concentrations of bioaerosols.

Authors:  Anne M Madsen; Kira Tendal; Vivi Schlünssen; Ivar Heltberg
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-05-02

4.  SWeRF--A method for estimating the relevant fine particle fraction in bulk materials for classification and labelling purposes.

Authors:  Ingeborg Pensis; Frank Luetzenkirchen; Bernd Friede
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-01-03

5.  Occupational Exposure and Environmental Release: The Case Study of Pouring TiO2 and Filler Materials for Paint Production.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Fonseca; Anna-Kaisa Viitanen; Tomi Kanerva; Arto Säämänen; Olivier Aguerre-Chariol; Sebastien Fable; Adrien Dermigny; Nicolas Karoski; Isaline Fraboulet; Ismo Kalevi Koponen; Camilla Delpivo; Alejandro Vilchez Villalba; Socorro Vázquez-Campos; Alexander Christian Østerskov Jensen; Signe Hjortkjær Nielsen; Nicklas Sahlgren; Per Axel Clausen; Bianca Xuan Nguyen Larsen; Vivi Kofoed-Sørensen; Keld Alstrup Jensen; Joonas Koivisto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Dustiness of fine and nanoscale powders.

Authors:  Douglas E Evans; Leonid A Turkevich; Cynthia T Roettgers; Gregory J Deye; Paul A Baron
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-10-12

7.  Comment on comparison of powder dustiness methods.

Authors:  Douglas E Evans; Leonid A Turkevich; Cynthia T Roettgers; Gregory J Deye
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-01-29

8.  Powder Intrinsic Properties as Dustiness Predictor for an Efficient Exposure Assessment?

Authors:  Neeraj Shandilya; Eelco Kuijpers; Ilse Tuinman; Wouter Fransman
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.179

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.