Literature DB >> 19955200

An audit of the outcome of amblyopia treatment: a retrospective analysis of 322 children.

M Awan1, F A Proudlock, D Grosvenor, I Choudhuri, N Sarvanananthan, I Gottlob.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Little is known about the effectiveness of occlusion therapy in hospital settings. A retrospective analysis was conducted to assess modalities, outcome and hospital costs of children treated for amblyopia with patching in a UK clinic.
METHODS: Notes of 322 children with amblyopia discharged after occlusion treatment were selected consecutively and reviewed. Data collated included age at presentation, amblyopia type, visual acuity (VA; before/after occlusion and at discharge), number of prescribed hours of occlusion, duration of patching treatment, number of glasses prescribed and number of visits attended or failed to attend. Hospital treatment costs were estimated.
RESULTS: Mixed amblyopes were prescribed the longest amount of patching (mean 2815 h over 23 months) followed by strabismic (1984 h) and anisometropic (1238 h) amblyopes. 319 amblyopes received glasses and five atropine treatment. The percentage of patients reaching VA of 6/12 was best in the anisometropic and strabismic groups (>75%) and worse in mixed amblyopia (64%). Average hospital costs were estimated at pound1365.
CONCLUSION: Although the mean duration of treatment was long, involving many hospital visits, the visual outcome was variable, unsatisfactory (<6/9) and more expensive than necessary. As compliance has been identified as a major problem methods to improve amblyopia treatment are needed, possibly by using educational/motivational intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19955200     DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.154674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  8 in total

1.  Interactive binocular treatment (I-BiT) for amblyopia: results of a pilot study of 3D shutter glasses system.

Authors:  N Herbison; S Cobb; R Gregson; I Ash; R Eastgate; J Purdy; T Hepburn; D MacKeith; A Foss
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Phase 2a randomised controlled feasibility trial of a new 'balanced binocular viewing' treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children age 3-8 years: trial protocol.

Authors:  Annegret Hella Dahlmann-Noor; John A Greenwood; Andrew Skilton; Daniel Baker; Siobhan Ludden; Amanda Davis; Hakim-Moulay Dehbi; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Amblyopia therapy in Asian children: factors affecting visual outcome and parents' perception of children's attitudes towards amblyopia treatment.

Authors:  Swati Handa; Audrey Chia
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  A computer-based anaglyphic system for the treatment of amblyopia.

Authors:  Ali Rastegarpour
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-16

Review 5.  Global processing in amblyopia: a review.

Authors:  Lisa M Hamm; Joanna Black; Shuan Dai; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-17

Review 6.  Cost and quality of life of overlooked eye care needs of children.

Authors:  Monali S Malvankar-Mehta; Ryan Wilson; Erik Leci; Kelly Hatch; Sapna Sharan
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2018-02-23

7.  Can Short-Term Ocular Dominance Plasticity Provide a General Index to Visual Plasticity to Personalize Treatment in Amblyopia?

Authors:  Chunwen Tao; Zhifen He; Yiya Chen; Jiawei Zhou; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 8.  Atropine Penalization Versus Occlusion Therapies for Unilateral Amblyopia after the Critical Period of Visual Development: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel C Osborne; Kathryn M Greenhalgh; Megan J E Evans; Jay E Self
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2018-10-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.