Literature DB >> 19954901

Do we really know the outcomes of prolapse surgery?

R M Freeman1.   

Abstract

The exact success rate from conventional as well as new surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse is unknown possibly due to the lack of standardisation of outcome measures. Usually objective measures, e.g. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) assessment have been used as the primary outcome in most studies which show that procedures such as anterior repair have a poor outcome. However these outcomes correlate poorly with subjective assessment and re-operation rates are lower than the anatomical failure rate suggesting that conventional surgery might not have as poor an outcome as previously suggested. Nonetheless, new procedures have been introduced for which efficacy and safety data are required via well conducted randomised controlled trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19954901     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  2 in total

1.  Discrepancies between patient-reported outcome measures when assessing urinary incontinence or pelvic-prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Michael Due Larsen; Gunnar Lose; Rikke Guldberg; Kim Oren Gradel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Concomitant surgical correction of severe stress urinary incontinence and anterior vaginal wall prolapse by anterior vaginal wall wrap: 18 months outcomes.

Authors:  Mahtab Zargham; Farshid Alizadeh; Farhad Tadayyon; Mohammad-Hatef Khorrami; Kia Nouri-Mahdavi; Mohammad Reza Gharaati; Mohammad Hossein Izadpanahi; Mohammad Yazdani; Hamid Mazdak
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.852

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.