Literature DB >> 19953774

Clinical evaluation of a two-step etch&rinse and a two-step self-etch adhesive system in Class II restorations: two-year results.

R Banu Ermis1, Ozge Kam, Esra Uzer Celik, U Burak Temel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the clinical performance of a two-step etch&rinse and a two-step self-etch adhesive system in Class II restorations after two years of clinical service.
METHODS: Thirty-three patients with primary caries or insufficient restorations were enrolled in the study. A total of 87 Class II cavities were restored, 44 using a two-step etch&rinse adhesive system (Single Bond, 3M ESPE) and 43 cavities using a two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray). Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE) was used as a restorative material for all the restorations. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, six months, and one and two years after placement for retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries, color match and anatomical form, according to the modified Ryge criteria.
RESULTS: At two years, the retention rates for Single Bond and Clearfil SE Bond were 94% and 100%, respectively, (p = 0.493). No significant differences were found between both groups for the other parameters evaluated.
CONCLUSION: Both of the adhesive systems that were tested demonstrated similar clinical performance at the end of this two-year clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19953774     DOI: 10.2341/08-114-C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  6 in total

1.  Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.

Authors:  Jan W V van Dijken; Ulla Pallesen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.

Authors:  Márcia Rezende; Ana Cristina Rodrigues Martins; Jadson Araújo da Silva; Alessandra Reis; Juliana Larocca de Geus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: a 3-year study.

Authors:  Çiğdem Çelik; Neslihan Arhun; Kivanc Yamanel
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Effect of different adhesive strategies on the post-operative sensitivity of class I composite restorations.

Authors:  Hande Sar Sancakli; Esra Yildiz; Isil Bayrak; Sevda Ozel
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-01

5.  Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonio J Ortiz-Ruiz; Nuria Pérez-Guzmán; María Rubio-Aparicio; Julio Sánchez-Meca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Knowledge and Attitudes of Dentists toward Adhesive System Selection: A Cross-sectional Study from Palestine.

Authors:  Naji Ziad Arandi; Mohammad Thabet
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2020-02-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.