Literature DB >> 19953773

Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite--a randomized clinical trial.

Michael F Burrow1, Danuchit Banomyong, Choltacha Harnirattisai, Harold H Messer.   

Abstract

This study investigated the ability of a glass-ionomer cement (GIC) lining to reduce postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite. In addition, the effects of a total-etch and self-etch adhesive on postoperative sensitivity were also compared. Patients who had moderate to deep occlusal caries of at least one molar were recruited. Overall, 103 restorations were placed in 70 participants, with an average age of 22.8 +/- 3.8 years. Preoperatively, each tooth was evaluated for cold-stimulated tooth sensitivity using a visual analog scale. If present, tooth sensitivity induced by cold/hot drinks or occlusal function was also noted. Caries was stained with a caries detector dye, then removed using slow-speed burs and hand excavators. The cavity was restored with one of four randomly allocated restorative procedures: 1) bonded with a two-step, total-etch adhesive (Single Bond 2); 2) lined with a resin-modified GIC liner (Fuji Lining LC), then bonded with total-etch adhesive; 3) bonded with a two-step, self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) and 4) lined with the GIC liner, then bonded with self-etch adhesive. The cavities were incrementally filled with a nanofilled hybrid resin composite. At recall, postoperative sensitivity was evaluated at one week and one month. Overall, postoperative sensitivity in daily function was rare. No significant difference in postoperative sensitivity, either in daily function or in response to a cold stimulus, was observed between the restorative procedures with or without the GIC liner, regardless of the adhesive used (p > 0.05). In addition, no difference in postoperative sensitivity was noted between use of the self-etch and total-etch adhesive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19953773     DOI: 10.2341/08-098-C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  14 in total

1.  Teaching posterior resin composites in UK and Ireland dental schools: do current teaching programmes match the expectation of clinical practice arrangements?

Authors:  C D Lynch; I R Blum; R J McConnell; K B Frazier; P A Brunton; N H F Wilson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  No more amalgams: Use of amalgam and amalgam alternative materials in primary dental care.

Authors:  C D Lynch; D J J Farnell; H Stanton; I G Chestnutt; P A Brunton; N H F Wilson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Restoration variables and postoperative hypersensitivity in Class I restorations: PEARL Network findings. Part 2.

Authors:  Peter Blanchard; Ying Wong; Abigail G Matthews; Donald Vena; Ronald G Craig; Frederick A Curro; Van P Thompson
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2013-04

4.  Effectiveness of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner in reducing hypersensitivity in posterior restorations: a study from the practitioners engaged in applied research and learning network.

Authors:  Brad Strober; Analia Veitz-Keenan; Julie Ann Barna; Abigail G Matthews; Donald Vena; Ronald G Craig; Frederick A Curro; Van P Thompson
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  Dentin caries activity in early occlusal lesions selected to receive operative treatment: findings from the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network.

Authors:  Maryann Lehmann; Analia Veitz-Keenan; Abigail G Matthews; Donald Vena; Ashley Grill; Ronald G Craig; Frederick A Curro; Van P Thompson
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.

Authors:  Andrew B Schenkel; Analia Veitz-Keenan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-05

Review 7.  Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.

Authors:  Andrew B Schenkel; Ivy Peltz; Analia Veitz-Keenan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-25

Review 8.  Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.

Authors:  Márcia Rezende; Ana Cristina Rodrigues Martins; Jadson Araújo da Silva; Alessandra Reis; Juliana Larocca de Geus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.606

9.  Postoperative hypersensitivity and its relationship to preparation variables in Class I resin-based composite restorations: findings from the practitioners engaged in applied research and learning (PEARL) Network. Part 1.

Authors:  Gary Berkowitz; Howard Spielman; Abigail Matthews; Donald Vena; Ronald Craig; Frederick Curro; Van Thompson
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2013-03

10.  Effect of different adhesive strategies on the post-operative sensitivity of class I composite restorations.

Authors:  Hande Sar Sancakli; Esra Yildiz; Isil Bayrak; Sevda Ozel
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.