Literature DB >> 19953772

Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled fissure sealant placed with different adhesive systems: 24-month results.

A Rüya Yazici1, Emel Karaman, Meserret Baseren, Duygu Tuncer, Esra Yazici, Sengül Unlüer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This clinical study compared the retention rates of a nanofilled occlusal fissure sealant placed with the use of an etch-and-rinse or a self-etch adhesive over 24 months.
METHODS: Two-hundred and forty-four sealants were placed on the permanent premolars and molars of 16 subjects who had no restorations or sealants present on the fissures and no detectable caries. The sealants were placed with either SoloBond M two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive or FuturaBond NR one-step self-etch adhesive by four previously calibrated dentists, using a table of random numbers. After completion of the adhesive application, a nanofilled sealant, Grandio Seal, was applied and light-cured. Clinical evaluations were done at baseline and at 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month recalls. Two other calibrated examiners, who were unaware of which adhesive had been used, independently evaluated the sealants. Evaluation of the sealants on every follow-up visit involved visual examination with the aid of a dental explorer and an intra-oral mirror. Each sealant was evaluated with the following criteria: 1 = completely retained; 2 = partial loss; 3 = total loss. The Pearson Chi-square test was used to evaluate differences in the retention rates among the sealants used with different adhesives for each evaluation period.
RESULTS: For the 12-month recalls, complete retention rates of 89.3% for the SoloBond M group and 20.5% for the FuturaBond NR group were observed. Sixteen of the 244 restorations were unavailable after 12 months. At 24 months, a total loss of 9 sealants in the SoloBond M group and 84 in the FuturaBond NR group were observed, resulting in retention rates of 81.6% and 15.8%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in retention rates between the SoloBond M and FuturaBond NR groups in all periods of evaluation (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference between the retention rates for premolars and molars was found at each evaluation period (p > 0.05). There was no new caries formation throughout the 24-month recall period.
CONCLUSION: Fissure sealants placed with etch-and-rinse adhesive showed better retention rates than those placed with self-etch adhesive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19953772     DOI: 10.2341/08-097-C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  7 in total

1.  A comparative study of clinical effectiveness of fissure sealing with and without bonding systems: 3-year results.

Authors:  C Sakkas; L Khomenko; I Trachuk
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2013-04-03

2.  Comparison of the Success Rate of Filled and Unfilled Resin-Based Fissure Sealants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Elmira Bagheri; Alireza Sarraf Shirazi; Kiana Shekofteh
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2022-02-08

3.  Comparison of Retention between Conventional and Nanofilled Resin Sealants in a Paediatric Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Vinayak Kamath; Mamata Hebbal; Anil Ankola; Roopali Sankeshwari; Sagar Jalihal; Abhra Choudhury; Mai Soliman; Elzahraa Eldwakhly
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  A comparative evaluation of retention of pit and fissure sealants placed with conventional acid etching and Er,Cr:YSGG laser etching: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gyanendra Kumar; Jatinder Kaur Dhillon; Ferah Rehman
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2016-12-30

5.  Caries progression in non-cavitated fissures after infiltrant application: a 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Camillo Anauate-Netto; Laurindo Borelli; Ricardo Amore; Vinicius DI Hipólito; Paulo Henrique Perlatti D'Alpino
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  The clinical effects of laser preparation of tooth surfaces for fissure sealants placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yunhan Zhang; Yan Wang; Yandi Chen; Yang Chen; Qiong Zhang; Jing Zou
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Clinical success rate of fissure sealants: one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mine Koruyucu; Dilara Bektas; Cengiz Aydinoglu; Pelin Barlak; Figen Seymen
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2020-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.