Literature DB >> 19953589

MutL: conducting the cell's response to mismatched and misaligned DNA.

Yaroslava Y Polosina1, Claire G Cupples.   

Abstract

Base pair mismatches in DNA arise from errors in DNA replication, recombination, and biochemical modification of bases. Mismatches are inherently transient. They are resolved passively by DNA replication, or actively by enzymatic removal and resynthesis of one of the bases. The first step in removal is recognition of strand discontinuity by one of the MutS proteins. Mismatches arising from errors in DNA replication are repaired in favor of the base on the template strand, but other mismatches trigger base excision or nucleotide excision repair (NER), or non-repair pathways such as hypermutation, cell cycle arrest, or apoptosis. We argue that MutL homologues play a key role in determining biologic outcome by recruiting and/or activating effector proteins in response to lesion recognition by MutS. We suggest that the process is regulated by conformational changes in MutL caused by cycles of ATP binding and hydrolysis, and by physiologic changes which influence effector availability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19953589     DOI: 10.1002/bies.200900089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  11 in total

Review 1.  Why Is DNA Double Stranded? The Discovery of DNA Excision Repair Mechanisms.

Authors:  Bernard S Strauss
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Reconstitution of the very short patch repair pathway from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Adam B Robertson; Steven W Matson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Conservation of functional asymmetry in the mammalian MutLα ATPase.

Authors:  Jennifer R Johnson; Naz Erdeniz; Megan Nguyen; Sandra Dudley; R Michael Liskay
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-11-10

4.  Chemical trapping of the dynamic MutS-MutL complex formed in DNA mismatch repair in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ines Winkler; Andreas D Marx; Damien Lariviere; Roger J Heinze; Michele Cristovao; Annet Reumer; Ute Curth; Titia K Sixma; Peter Friedhoff
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  The C-terminal domain of the MutL homolog from Neisseria gonorrhoeae forms an inverted homodimer.

Authors:  Sivakumar Namadurai; Deepti Jain; Dhananjay S Kulkarni; Chaitanya R Tabib; Peter Friedhoff; Desirazu N Rao; Deepak T Nair
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The ATPase activity of MLH1 is required to orchestrate DNA double-strand breaks and end processing during class switch recombination.

Authors:  Richard Chahwan; Johanna M M van Oers; Elena Avdievich; Chunfang Zhao; Winfried Edelmann; Matthew D Scharff; Sergio Roa
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 14.307

Review 7.  Structural, functional and evolutionary relationships between homing endonucleases and proteins from their host organisms.

Authors:  Gregory K Taylor; Barry L Stoddard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Mismatch repair genes Mlh1 and Mlh3 modify CAG instability in Huntington's disease mice: genome-wide and candidate approaches.

Authors:  Ricardo Mouro Pinto; Ella Dragileva; Andrew Kirby; Alejandro Lloret; Edith Lopez; Jason St Claire; Gagan B Panigrahi; Caixia Hou; Kim Holloway; Tammy Gillis; Jolene R Guide; Paula E Cohen; Guo-Min Li; Christopher E Pearson; Mark J Daly; Vanessa C Wheeler
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  MutS Homologues hMSH4 and hMSH5: Genetic Variations, Functions, and Implications in Human Diseases.

Authors:  Nicole Clark; Xiling Wu; Chengtao Her
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  Modern aspects of the structural and functional organization of the DNA mismatch repair system.

Authors:  S A Perevoztchikova; E A Romanova; T S Oretskaya; P Friedhoff; E A Kubareva
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.