Literature DB >> 19952725

Cerebral blood flow, blood volume, and mean transit time responses to propofol and indomethacin in peritumor and contralateral brain regions: perioperative perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with brain tumors.

Mads Rasmussen1, Niels Juul, Søren M Christensen, Kristjana Y Jónsdóttir, Carsten Gyldensted, Peter Vestergaard-Poulsen, Georg E Cold, Leif Østergaard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) response to propofol and indomethacin may be abnormal in patients with brain tumors. First, the authors tested the hypothesis that during propofol anesthesia alone and combined with indomethacin, changes in CBF, cerebral blood volume (CBV), and plasma mean transit time (MTT) differ in the peritumoral tissue compared with the contralateral normal brain region. Second, the authors tested the hypothesis that CBF and CBV are reduced and MTT is prolonged, in both regions during propofol anesthesia and indomethacin administration compared with propofol alone.
METHODS: The authors studied eight patients subjected to craniotomy under propofol-fentanyl anesthesia for supratentorial brain tumors. Magnetic resonance imaging, including perfusion- and diffusion-weighted and structural sequences, was performed (1) on the day before surgery, (2) before and (3) after administration of indomethacin in the propofol-fentanyl anesthetized patient, and (4) 2 days after surgery. Maps of CBF, CBV, and MTT were calculated. The regions of interest were peritumoral gray matter and opposite contralateral gray matter. Analysis of variance was used to analyze flow data.
RESULTS: Propofol anesthesia was associated with a median 32% (range, 3-61%) and 47% (range, 17-67%) reduction in CBF in the peritumoral and contralateral regions, respectively.The interaction between intervention with propofol and indomethacin and region of interest was not significant for any flow modalities. Neither intervention nor region was significant for MTT, CBF, and CBV (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The CBF, CBV, and MTT responses to propofol and indomethacin are not different in the peritumoral region compared with contralateral brain tissue. Indomethacin did not further influence regional CBF, CBV, and MTT during propofol anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19952725     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c38bd3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: Cutting-edge improvement in neurosurgical procedures.

Authors:  Stephan Ulmer
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28

2.  Early postoperative cognitive dysfunction and postoperative delirium after anaesthesia with various hypnotics: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial--the PINOCCHIO trial.

Authors:  Federico Bilotta; Andrea Doronzio; Elisabetta Stazi; Luca Titi; Ivan Orlando Zeppa; Antonella Cianchi; Giovanni Rosa; Francesca Paola Paoloni; Sergio Bergese; Irene Asouhidou; Polimnia Ioannou; Apolonia Elisabeth Abramowicz; Allison Spinelli; Ellise Delphin; Eugenia Ayrian; Vladimir Zelman; Philip Lumb
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Postoperative neurological aggravation after anesthesia with sevoflurane in a patient with xeroderma pigmentosum: a case report.

Authors:  Salaheddine Fjouji; Mustapha Bensghir; Bahija Yafat; Najib Bouhabba; Elhoucine Boutayeb; Hicham Azendour; Nordine Drissi Kamili
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2013-03-14

4.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging is a powerful approach to probing the mechanism of action of therapeutic drugs that act on the central nervous system.

Authors:  Shu-Feng Zhou
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Effect of ephedrine and phenylephrine on brain oxygenation and microcirculation in anaesthetised patients with cerebral tumours: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Klaus Ulrik Koch; Anna Tietze; Joel Aanerud; Gorm von Öettingen; Niels Juul; Jens Christian Hedemann Sørensen; Lone Nikolajsen; Leif Østergaard; Mads Rasmussen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.