Literature DB >> 1995262

Effect of intraesophageal location and muscarinic blockade on balloon distension-induced chest pain.

W G Paterson1, M Selucky, T T Hynna-Liepert.   

Abstract

Intraesophageal balloon distension has been introduced recently as a provocative test in the assessment of patients with noncardiac chest pain. In order to examine the effect of balloon location and muscarinic blockade on distension-induced pain, 10 asymptomatic male volunteers were studied on two separate days using a low-compliance perfused manometry system that incorporated a silicone rubber balloon. Five-second-duration balloon distensions using balloon volumes of 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 ml of air were performed with the balloon located both 16 cm (proximal site) and 6 cm (distal site) above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) before and after administration of atropine (10 micrograms/kg intravenously) or placebo in a randomized double-blind fashion. A standardized scoring system was used to assess the balloon distension-induced pain. Pain scores varied directly with balloon volume but were consistently higher with the balloon located at the proximal site versus the distal site. This was not associated with any differences in intraballoon pressures between the two sites; however, contraction amplitude orad to the balloon was greater with balloon distension at the proximal site. Atropine significantly decreased pain sensation scores with the balloon located distally but not proximally. This attenuation was not associated with significant changes in intraballoon pressures; however, contractions orad to the balloon were markedly inhibited by atropine with distal but not with proximal distension. These studies indicate that balloon distension-induced pain varies depending on the location of distension. This difference is not explained by differences in esophageal wall tension at the site of distension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1995262     DOI: 10.1007/bf01318197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  15 in total

1.  SCLERODERMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS. A CORRELATION OF HISTOLOGIC AND PHYSIOLOGIC FINDINGS.

Authors:  W L TREACY; A H BAGGENSTOSS; C H SLOCUMB; C F CODE
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1963-09       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Neuromuscular mechanisms of esophageal responses at and proximal to a distending balloon.

Authors:  W G Paterson
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-01

3.  Spontaneous noncardiac chest pain: value of ambulatory esophageal pH and motility monitoring.

Authors:  E E Soffer; P Scalabrini; D L Wingate
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Reinnervation of skeletal muscles by vagal sensory fibres in the sheep, cat and rabbit.

Authors:  M Falempin; J P Rousseau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Abnormal sensory perception in patients with esophageal chest pain.

Authors:  J E Richter; C F Barish; D O Castell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Esophageal chest pain. Value of high-dose provocative testing with edrophonium chloride in patients with normal esophageal manometries.

Authors:  C A Lee; J C Reynolds; A Ouyang; L Baker; S Cohen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Comparison of intravenous edrophonium and oesophageal acid perfusion during oesophageal manometry in patients with non-cardiac chest pain.

Authors:  J S De Caestecker; A Pryde; R C Heading
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Results of three years' experience with 1161 patients.

Authors:  P O Katz; C B Dalton; J E Richter; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Prospective manometric evaluation with pharmacologic provocation of patients with suspected esophageal motility dysfunction.

Authors:  S B Benjamin; J E Richter; C M Cordova; T E Knuff; D O Castell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Esophageal chest pain: current controversies in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:  J E Richter; L A Bradley; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Management of gastrointestinal motility disorders. A practical guide to drug selection and appropriate ancillary measures.

Authors:  J R Malagelada; E Distrutti
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Esophageal mucosal sensitivity: possible links with clinical presentations in patients with erosive esophagitis and laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Murat Korkmaz; Erkan Tarhan; Hakan Unal; Haldun Selcuk; Ugur Yilmaz; Levent Ozluoglu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Compliance measurement of lower esophageal sphincter and esophageal body in achalasia and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  A D Jenkinson; S M Scott; E Yazaki; G Fusai; S M Walker; S S Kadirkamanathan; D F Evans
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Esophageal sensitivity and symptom perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  G Shi; R P Tatum; R J Joehl; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-06

5.  Esophageal and lower esophageal sphincter response to balloon distention in patients with achalasia.

Authors:  W G Paterson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Medical treatment of esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  H D Allescher; W J Ravich
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Imipramine decreases oesophageal pain perception in human male volunteers.

Authors:  P L Peghini; P O Katz; D O Castell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Effect of atropine on the biomechanical properties of the oesophageal wall in humans.

Authors:  Torahiko Takeda; Ghassan Kassab; Jianmin Liu; Toshinaga Nabae; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Increasing pain sensation to repeated esophageal balloon distension in patients with chest pain of undetermined etiology.

Authors:  W G Paterson; H Wang; S J Vanner
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.