Literature DB >> 19952244

Older patients can accurately recall their preoperative health status six weeks following total hip arthroplasty.

Jackie Marsh1, Dianne Bryant, Steven J MacDonald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In clinical trials, use of patient recall data would be beneficial when the collection of baseline data is impossible, such as in trauma situations. We investigated the ability of older patients to accurately recall their preoperative quality of life, function, and general health status at six weeks following total hip arthroplasty.
METHODS: We randomized consecutive patients who were fifty-five years of age or older into two groups. At each assessment, patients completed self-report questionnaires (at four weeks preoperatively, on the day of surgery, and at six weeks and three months postoperatively for Group 1 and at six weeks and three months postoperatively for Group 2). At six weeks postoperatively, all patients completed the questionnaires on the basis of their recollection of their preoperative health status. We evaluated the validity and reliability of recall ratings, the degree of error in recall ratings, and the effects of the use of recall data on power and sample size requirements.
RESULTS: A total of 174 patients (mean age, seventy-one years) who were undergoing either primary or revision total hip arthroplasty were randomized and included in the analysis (118 patients were in Group 1 and fifty-six were in Group 2). Agreement between actual and recalled data was excellent for disease-specific questionnaires (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.86, 0.87, and 0.88) and moderate for generic health measures (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.48, 0.58, and 0.60). Increased error associated with recalled ratings compared with actual ratings necessitates minimal increases in sample size or results in small decreases in power.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty can accurately recall their preoperative health status at six weeks postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19952244     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  19 in total

1.  Prosthetic inlay resurfacing for the treatment of focal, full thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle: a bridge between biologics and conventional arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter Bollars; Marc Bosquet; Bruno Vandekerckhove; François Hardeman; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Responsiveness of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) in patients with femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Carl Johan Hedbeck; Jan Tidermark; Sari Ponzer; Richard Blomfeldt; Gunnar Bergström
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the most elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Carl Johan Hedbeck; Richard Blomfeldt; Gunilla Lapidus; Hans Törnkvist; Sari Ponzer; Jan Tidermark
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Quality of life for up to 18 months after low-energy hip, vertebral, and distal forearm fractures-results from the ICUROS.

Authors:  A Svedbom; F Borgstöm; E Hernlund; O Ström; V Alekna; M L Bianchi; P Clark; M D Curiel; H P Dimai; M Jürisson; R Kallikorm; M Lember; O Lesnyak; E McCloskey; K M Sanders; S Silverman; A Solodovnikov; M Tamulaitiene; T Thomas; N Toroptsova; A Uusküla; A N A Tosteson; B Jönsson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Health-related quality of life during the first year after a hip fracture: results of the Mexican arm of the International Cost and Utility Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (MexICUROS).

Authors:  L Guirant; F Carlos; D Curiel; J A Kanis; F Borgström; A Svedbom; P Clark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Accuracy of patient recall of hand and elbow disability on the QuickDASH questionnaire over a two-year period.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Stepan; Daniel A London; Martin I Boyer; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  High recall bias in retrospective assessment of the pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire (Pedi-IKDC) in children with knee pathologies.

Authors:  Luca Macchiarola; Massimo Pirone; Alberto Grassi; Nicola Pizza; Giovanni Trisolino; Stefano Stilli; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.114

8.  A comparison of conventional and retrospective measures of change in symptoms after elective surgery.

Authors:  Eva M Bitzer; Marco Petrucci; Christoph Lorenz; Rugzan Hussein; Hans Dörning; Alf Trojan; Stefan Nickel
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Protocol for a prospective cohort study of open tibia fractures in Malawi with a nested implementation of open fracture guidelines.

Authors:  Alexander Thomas Schade; Nohakhelha Nyamulani; Leonard Ngoe Banza; Andrew John Metcalfe; Andrew Leather; Jason J Madan; David G Lallloo; Williams James Harrison; Peter MacPherson
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2021-09-13

10.  Recall of preoperative Oxford Hip and Knee Scores one year after arthroplasty is an alternative and reliable technique when used for a cohort of patients.

Authors:  T F M Yeoman; N D Clement; D Macdonald; M Moran
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.