Literature DB >> 19952138

Genome-wide dynamics of replication timing revealed by in vitro models of mouse embryogenesis.

Ichiro Hiratani1, Tyrone Ryba, Mari Itoh, Joy Rathjen, Michael Kulik, Bernadett Papp, Eden Fussner, David P Bazett-Jones, Kathrin Plath, Stephen Dalton, Peter D Rathjen, David M Gilbert.   

Abstract

Differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) is accompanied by changes in replication timing. To explore the relationship between replication timing and cell fate transitions, we constructed genome-wide replication-timing profiles of 22 independent mouse cell lines representing 10 stages of early mouse development, and transcription profiles for seven of these stages. Replication profiles were cell-type specific, with 45% of the genome exhibiting significant changes at some point during development that were generally coordinated with changes in transcription. Comparison of early and late epiblast cell culture models revealed a set of early-to-late replication switches completed at a stage equivalent to the post-implantation epiblast, prior to germ layer specification and down-regulation of key pluripotency transcription factors [POU5F1 (also known as OCT4)/NANOG/SOX2] and coinciding with the emergence of compact chromatin near the nuclear periphery. These changes were maintained in all subsequent lineages (lineage-independent) and involved a group of irreversibly down-regulated genes, at least some of which were repositioned closer to the nuclear periphery. Importantly, many genomic regions of partially reprogrammed induced pluripotent stem cells (piPSCs) failed to re-establish ESC-specific replication-timing and transcription programs. These regions were enriched for lineage-independent early-to-late changes, which in female cells included the inactive X chromosome. Together, these results constitute a comprehensive "fate map" of replication-timing changes during early mouse development. Moreover, they support a model in which a distinct set of replication domains undergoes a form of "autosomal Lyonization" in the epiblast that is difficult to reprogram and coincides with an epigenetic commitment to differentiation prior to germ layer specification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19952138      PMCID: PMC2813472          DOI: 10.1101/gr.099796.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  59 in total

Review 1.  Heterogeneity of eukaryotic replicons, replicon clusters, and replication foci.

Authors:  R Berezney; D D Dubey; J A Huberman
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  The spatial position and replication timing of chromosomal domains are both established in early G1 phase.

Authors:  D S Dimitrova; D M Gilbert
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  Visualizing chromatin dynamics in interphase nuclei.

Authors:  Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Replicating by the clock.

Authors:  Alon Goren; Howard Cedar
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development.

Authors:  Ian Chambers; Jose Silva; Douglas Colby; Jennifer Nichols; Bianca Nijmeijer; Morag Robertson; Jan Vrana; Ken Jones; Lars Grotewold; Austin Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Paul J Tesar; Josh G Chenoweth; Frances A Brook; Timothy J Davies; Edward P Evans; David L Mack; Richard L Gardner; Ronald D G McKay
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells.

Authors:  Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Manching Ku; David B Jaffe; Biju Issac; Erez Lieberman; Georgia Giannoukos; Pablo Alvarez; William Brockman; Tae-Kyung Kim; Richard P Koche; William Lee; Eric Mendenhall; Aisling O'Donovan; Aviva Presser; Carsten Russ; Xiaohui Xie; Alexander Meissner; Marius Wernig; Rudolf Jaenisch; Chad Nusbaum; Eric S Lander; Bradley E Bernstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Directed differentiation of pluripotent cells to neural lineages: homogeneous formation and differentiation of a neurectoderm population.

Authors:  Joy Rathjen; Bryan P Haines; Kathryn M Hudson; Antonietta Nesci; Stephanie Dunn; Peter D Rathjen
Journal:  Development       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Transient pluripotent cell populations during primitive ectoderm formation: correlation of in vivo and in vitro pluripotent cell development.

Authors:  T A Pelton; S Sharma; T C Schulz; J Rathjen; P D Rathjen
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 5.235

10.  Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos.

Authors:  I Gabrielle M Brons; Lucy E Smithers; Matthew W B Trotter; Peter Rugg-Gunn; Bowen Sun; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; Sarah K Howlett; Amanda Clarkson; Lars Ahrlund-Richter; Roger A Pedersen; Ludovic Vallier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  169 in total

1.  Genome-scale analysis of replication timing: from bench to bioinformatics.

Authors:  Tyrone Ryba; Dana Battaglia; Benjamin D Pope; Ichiro Hiratani; David M Gilbert
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  Regulation of DNA replication during development.

Authors:  Jared Nordman; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Developmental control of gene copy number by repression of replication initiation and fork progression.

Authors:  Noa Sher; George W Bell; Sharon Li; Jared Nordman; Thomas Eng; Matthew L Eaton; David M Macalpine; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Clusters, factories and domains: The complex structure of S-phase comes into focus.

Authors:  Peter J Gillespie; J Julian Blow
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types.

Authors:  Tyrone Ryba; Ichiro Hiratani; Junjie Lu; Mari Itoh; Michael Kulik; Jinfeng Zhang; Thomas C Schulz; Allan J Robins; Stephen Dalton; David M Gilbert
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 6.  Eukaryotic DNA replication origins: many choices for appropriate answers.

Authors:  Marcel Méchali
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Single-molecule analysis reveals changes in the DNA replication program for the POU5F1 locus upon human embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Sherri S Schultz; Sabrina C Desbordes; Zhuo Du; Settapong Kosiyatrakul; Inna Lipchina; Lorenz Studer; Carl L Schildkraut
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  The distribution of genomic variations in human iPSCs is related to replication-timing reorganization during reprogramming.

Authors:  Junjie Lu; Hu Li; Ming Hu; Takayo Sasaki; Anna Baccei; David M Gilbert; Jun S Liu; James J Collins; Paul H Lerou
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Profiling DNA Replication Timing Using Zebrafish as an In Vivo Model System.

Authors:  Joseph C Siefert; Emily A Clowdus; Duane Goins; Amnon Koren; Christopher L Sansam
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Domain-wide regulation of DNA replication timing during mammalian development.

Authors:  Benjamin D Pope; Ichiro Hiratani; David M Gilbert
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.