Literature DB >> 19952091

Validity and responsiveness of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II to assess disability in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Jorit J L Meesters1, John Verhoef, Inge S L Liem, Hein Putter, Thea P M Vliet Vlieland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity and responsiveness of the World Health Organization Disability Schedule II (WHODAS II) in patients with established RA.
METHODS: In 85 RA patients admitted for rehabilitation, the WHODAS II (0-100) was applied at admission and 6 weeks after discharge. Additional assessments included measures of physical and psychological functioning, disease activity and quality of life. The internal consistency of the WHODAS II was determined with Cronbach's-alpha. Associations between the WHODAS II and other outcome measures were determined by Pearson's rank correlation coefficients. Responsiveness measures included the standardized response mean (SRM), effect size (ES) and responsiveness ratio (RR).
RESULTS: Cronbach's-alpha of the WHODAS II total score was 0.91. The baseline WHODAS II total score correlated significantly with all other outcome measures, except for the 50-feet walk test, the timed-stands test and the Escola Paulista de Medicina Range of Motion scale. The mean WHODAS II total score improved from 40.5 (s.d. 14.9) at baseline to 4.6 at 6 weeks after discharge (95% CI -8.1, -1.2). The WHODAS II responsiveness scores were -0.35 (SRM), -0.34 (ES) and -0.58 (RR) at 6 weeks after discharge. CONCLUSION; The WHODAS II appeared to be internally consistent, valid and responsive to assess disability in patients with established RA admitted for multidisciplinary team care in terms of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The WHODAS II showed significant floor effects regarding the subscales--'understanding communicating' and 'getting along with people'. In a multidisciplinary setting, the additional use of measures to evaluate personal and environmental factors seems warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19952091     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  13 in total

1.  Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD).

Authors:  Noelle E Carlozzi; Anna L Kratz; Nancy R Downing; Siera Goodnight; Jennifer A Miner; Nicholas Migliore; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Functional Impairment in Borderline Personality Disorder: The Mediating Role of Perceived Social Support.

Authors:  Beatriz Thadani; Ana M Pérez-García; José Bermúdez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  Development of the Global Disability Scale (Glo.Di.S): preliminary results.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Eirini Lekka; Evangelia Kouidi; Ioanna Chouvarda; Asterios Deligiannis; Nickolaos Maglaveras
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 4.  Measurement properties of physical function scales validated for use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Martijn A H Oude Voshaar; Peter M ten Klooster; Erik Taal; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Reliability and Validity of the HIV Disability Questionnaire (HDQ) with Adults Living with HIV in the United States.

Authors:  Kelly Kathleen O'Brien; David Kietrys; Mary Lou Galantino; James Scott Parrott; Tracy Davis; Quang Tran; Rachel Aubry; Patricia Solomon
Journal:  J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec

6.  Reliability and validity of a new HIV-specific questionnaire with adults living with HIV in Canada and Ireland: the HIV Disability Questionnaire (HDQ).

Authors:  Kelly K O'Brien; Patricia Solomon; Colm Bergin; Siobhán O'Dea; Paul Stratford; Nkem Iku; Ahmed M Bayoumi
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Validation of World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in Norway.

Authors:  Vegard Pihl Moen; Jorunn Drageset; Geir Egil Eide; Mari Klokkerud; Sturla Gjesdal
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  A comparison between WHODAS 2.0 and Modified Barthel Index: which tool is more suitable for assessing the disability and the recovery rate in orthopedic rehabilitation?

Authors:  Tiziana Galli; Paolo Mirata; Emanuela Foglia; Davide Croce; Emanuele Porazzi; Lucrezia Ferrario; Elena Ricci; Elisabetta Garagiola; Roberta Pagani; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-06-05

9.  Comparison of the responsiveness of the WOMAC and the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin-Beck disease.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Dimiao Wang; Xiuxia Li; Hangjing Yuan; Hua Fang; Xiong Guo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0.

Authors:  Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska; Bernard Sozański; Hubert Kotarski; Anna Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska; Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.