Paul L Reiter1, Noel T Brewer, Jennifer S Smith. 1. University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7440, USA. preiter@email.unc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: If approved for use in young males in the United States, prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine may reduce the incidence of HPV-related disease in vaccinated males and their sexual partners. We aimed to characterise heterosexual men's willingness to get HPV vaccine and identify correlates of vaccine acceptability. METHODS: Participants were from a national sample of heterosexual men (n=297) aged 18-59 y from the United States who were interviewed in January 2009. We analysed data using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Most men had not heard of HPV prior to the study or had low HPV knowledge (81%; 239/296). Most men had heard of HPV vaccine prior to the study (63%; 186/296) and 37% (109/296) were willing to get HPV vaccine. Men were more willing to get vaccinated if they reported higher perceived likelihood of getting HPV-related disease (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.17), perceived HPV vaccine effectiveness (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.83) or anticipated regret if they did not get vaccinated and an HPV infection later developed (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.89). Acceptability was also higher among men who thought (OR 9.02, 95% CI 3.45 to 23.60) or who were unsure (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.30 to 5.47) if their doctor would recommend they get HPV vaccine if licensed for males. CONCLUSIONS: Men had low HPV knowledge and were moderately willing to get HPV vaccine. These findings underscore the need for HPV educational efforts for men and provide insight into some of the factors that may affect the HPV vaccination decision making process among men.
OBJECTIVES: If approved for use in young males in the United States, prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine may reduce the incidence of HPV-related disease in vaccinated males and their sexual partners. We aimed to characterise heterosexual men's willingness to get HPV vaccine and identify correlates of vaccine acceptability. METHODS:Participants were from a national sample of heterosexual men (n=297) aged 18-59 y from the United States who were interviewed in January 2009. We analysed data using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Most men had not heard of HPV prior to the study or had low HPV knowledge (81%; 239/296). Most men had heard of HPV vaccine prior to the study (63%; 186/296) and 37% (109/296) were willing to get HPV vaccine. Men were more willing to get vaccinated if they reported higher perceived likelihood of getting HPV-related disease (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.17), perceived HPV vaccine effectiveness (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.83) or anticipated regret if they did not get vaccinated and an HPV infection later developed (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.89). Acceptability was also higher among men who thought (OR 9.02, 95% CI 3.45 to 23.60) or who were unsure (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.30 to 5.47) if their doctor would recommend they get HPV vaccine if licensed for males. CONCLUSIONS:Men had low HPV knowledge and were moderately willing to get HPV vaccine. These findings underscore the need for HPV educational efforts for men and provide insight into some of the factors that may affect the HPV vaccination decision making process among men.
Authors: Paul L Reiter; Noel T Brewer; Sami L Gottlieb; Annie-Laurie McRee; Jennifer S Smith Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Katie M Keating; Noel T Brewer; Sami L Gottlieb; Nicole Liddon; Christina Ludema; Jennifer S Smith Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Daron G Ferris; Jennifer L Waller; Jeremiah Miller; Pratik Patel; Lanier Jackson; George A Price; Courtesia Wilson Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: C H Lenselink; C E Schmeink; W J G Melchers; L F A G Massuger; J C M Hendriks; D van Hamont; R L M Bekkers Journal: Public Health Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 2.427
Authors: Daron G Ferris; Jennifer L Waller; Jeremiah Miller; Pratik Patel; George A Price; Lanier Jackson; Courtesia Wilson Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Anna R Giuliano; Beibei Lu; Carrie M Nielson; Roberto Flores; Mary R Papenfuss; Ji-Hyun Lee; Martha Abrahamsen; Robin B Harris Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2008-09-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Annie-Laurie McRee; Paul L Reiter; Kim Chantala; Noel T Brewer Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Tracy A Battaglia; Christine M Gunn; Molly E McCoy; Helen H Mu; Amy S Baranoski; Elizabeth Y Chiao; Lisa A Kachnic; Elizabeth A Stier Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2015-08-04