Literature DB >> 19951825

Bisecting the mental number line in near and far space.

Matthew R Longo1, Stella F Lourenco.   

Abstract

Much evidence suggests that common posterior parietal mechanisms underlie the orientation of attention in physical space and along the mental number line. For example, the small leftward bias (pseudoneglect) found in paper-and-pencil line bisection is also found when participants "bisect" number pairs, estimating (without calculating) the number midway between two others. For bisection of physical lines, pseudoneglect has been found to shift rightward as lines are moved from near space (immediately surrounding the body) to far space. We investigated whether the presentation of stimuli in near or far space also modulated spatial attention for the mental number line. Participants bisected physical lines or number pairs presented at four distances (60, 120, 180, 240cm). Clear rightward shifts in bias were observed for both tasks. Furthermore, the rate at which this shift occurred in the two tasks, as measured by least-squares regression slopes, was significantly correlated across participants, suggesting that the transition from near to far distances induced a common modulation of lateral attention in physical and numerical space. These results demonstrate a tight coupling between number and physical space, and show that even such prototypically abstract concepts as number are modulated by our on-line interactions with the world. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19951825     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  14 in total

1.  Representational pseudoneglect in line bisection.

Authors:  Stephen Darling; Robert H Logie; Sergio Della Sala
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

Review 2.  The cognitive phenotype of spina bifida meningomyelocele.

Authors:  Maureen Dennis; Marcia A Barnes
Journal:  Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2010

3.  Number line estimation and complex mental calculation: Is there a shared cognitive process driving the two tasks?

Authors:  Maria Montefinese; Carlo Semenza
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-05-17

4.  A cross-sectional study of the development of volitional control of spatial attention in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Authors:  Heather M Shapiro; Yukari Takarae; Danielle J Harvey; Margarita H Cabaral; Tony J Simon
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 5.  Representational pseudoneglect: a review.

Authors:  Joanna L Brooks; Sergio Della Sala; Stephen Darling
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  Developmental neuroscience of time and number: implications for autism and other neurodevelopmental disabilities.

Authors:  Melissa J Allman; Kevin A Pelphrey; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-06

7.  Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Gemma Learmonth; Aodhan Gallagher; Jamie Gibson; Gregor Thut; Monika Harvey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Development of a Possible General Magnitude System for Number and Space.

Authors:  Karin Kucian; Ursina McCaskey; Michael von Aster; Ruth O'Gorman Tuura
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-19

9.  When numbers get heavy: is the mental number line exclusively numerical?

Authors:  Kevin J Holmes; Stella F Lourenco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How Deep Is Your SNARC? Interactions Between Numerical Magnitude, Response Hands, and Reachability in Peripersonal Space.

Authors:  Johannes Lohmann; Philipp A Schroeder; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Christian Plewnia; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.