OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic significance of Meek skin grafting and automicrografting combined with large piece of allogenous skin (micrografting in brief) in the treatment of patients with extensive deep burn. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with extensive deep burn admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College were divided into Meek skin grafting group and micrografting group, with 12 patients in each group. Statistical comparison between Meek skin grafting group and micrografting group in respect of wound healing time, consumption of each special dressing, total cost of hospitalization, rehabilitation cost during convalescence was made. Then the cost and effect value was compared between two groups. RESULTS: The wound healing time, consumption of each special dressing, total cost of hospitalization and rehabilitation cost in Meek skin grafting group was (14.4 +/- 1.9) d, yen(16 590 +/- 521), yen(421 628 +/- 145), yen(39 571 +/- 225), respectively, and that in micrografting group was (25.6 +/- 4.2) d, yen (136 441 +/- 356), yen(539 526 +/- 686), yen(55 853 +/- 794), respectively. The difference between two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In a definite range of burn size, Meek skin grafting has a lower therapeutic cost and better therapeutic effects as compared with micrografting.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic significance of Meek skin grafting and automicrografting combined with large piece of allogenous skin (micrografting in brief) in the treatment of patients with extensive deep burn. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with extensive deep burn admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College were divided into Meek skin grafting group and micrografting group, with 12 patients in each group. Statistical comparison between Meek skin grafting group and micrografting group in respect of wound healing time, consumption of each special dressing, total cost of hospitalization, rehabilitation cost during convalescence was made. Then the cost and effect value was compared between two groups. RESULTS: The wound healing time, consumption of each special dressing, total cost of hospitalization and rehabilitation cost in Meek skin grafting group was (14.4 +/- 1.9) d, yen(16 590 +/- 521), yen(421 628 +/- 145), yen(39 571 +/- 225), respectively, and that in micrografting group was (25.6 +/- 4.2) d, yen (136 441 +/- 356), yen(539 526 +/- 686), yen(55 853 +/- 794), respectively. The difference between two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In a definite range of burn size, Meek skin grafting has a lower therapeutic cost and better therapeutic effects as compared with micrografting.