Literature DB >> 19950790

Laparoscopic rectal resection without splenic flexure mobilization: a prospective study assessing anastomotic safety.

Jin Kim1, Dong-Jin Choi, Seon-Hahn Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It was hypothesized that a portion of the sigmoid colon and accompanying marginal artery can be preserved by omitting the complete mobilization of the splenic flexure, yet achieve safe anastomosis. This study was designed to compare the surgical safety of omitting splenic flexure mobilization during laparoscopic rectal surgery in patients with rectal cancer.
METHODOLOGY: Between September 2006 and January 2008, laparoscopic rectal resection was performed in 160 consecutive patients with rectosigmoid and rectal cancer. Five patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) were excluded from this analysis. Morbidity and mortality were recorded prospectively. Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM), anastomotic leakage, bleeding, and stricture rate were analyzed in this group.
RESULTS: The median operative time was 225 min. There were no operative mortalities. SFM was required in 7 patients (4.5%). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 patients (8.4%), anastomotic bleeding occurred in 4 patients (2.6%), and 3 patients (1.9%) had strictures. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 19.
CONCLUSIONS: A portion of the sigmoid colon can be safely used as the proximal bowel segment for anastomosis during laparoscopic rectal surgery, and thus full mobilization of the splenic flexure can be omitted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19950790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  6 in total

1.  Effect of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing on lymph node harvest in T1 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeonghyun Kang; Heae Surng Park; Im-kyung Kim; Younghae Song; Seung Hyuk Baik; Seung-Kook Sohn; Kang Young Lee
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  What are 30-day postoperative outcomes following splenic flexure mobilization during anterior resection?

Authors:  R M Carlson; P L Roberts; J F Hall; P W Marcello; D J Schoetz; T E Read; R Ricciardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Lengthening of the colon for low rectal anastomosis in a cadaveric study: how much can we gain?

Authors:  S Thum-umnuaysuk; A Boonyapibal; Y Y Geng; J Pattana-Arun
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Different approaches for complete mobilization of the splenic flexure during laparoscopic rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Volker Benseler; Matthias Hornung; Igors Iesalnieks; Philipp von Breitenbuch; Gabriel Glockzin; Hans J Schlitt; Ayman Agha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Is routine splenic flexure mobilization always necessary in laparotomic or laparoscopic anterior rectal resection? A systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fabio Rondelli; Alessandro Pasculli; Michele De Rosa; Stefano Avenia; Walter Bugiantella
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-07-24

6.  Laparoscopic rectal resection versus open rectal resection with minilaparotomy for invasive rectal cancer.

Authors:  Tong Zhou; Guangjun Zhang; Hongpeng Tian; Zuoliang Liu; Shusen Xia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.