Literature DB >> 19949984

Feasibility of template-guided attenuation correction in cat brain PET imaging.

Jin Su Kim1, Jae Sung Lee, Min-Hyun Park, Kyeong Min Kim, Seung-Ha Oh, Gi Jeong Cheon, In Chan Song, Dae Hyuk Moon, June-Key Chung, Dong Soo Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Attenuation correction (AC) is important in quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of medium-sized animals such as the cat. However, additional time for transmission (TX) scanning and tracer uptake is required in PET studies with animal-dedicated PET scanners because post-injection TX scanning is not available in these systems. The aim of this study was to validate a template-guided AC (TGAC) method that does not require TX PET data for AC in cat 2-deoxy-2-[F-(18)fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) brain PET imaging.
METHODS: PET scans were acquired using a microPET Focus 120 scanner. TX data were obtained using a (68)Ge point source before the injection of FDG. To generate the attention map (mu-map) template for the TGAC, a target image of emission (EM) PET was selected, and spatial normalization parameters of individual EM data onto the target were reapplied to the corresponding mu-maps. The inverse transformations of the mu-map template into the individual spaces were performed, and the transformed template was forward projected to generate the AC factor. The TGAC method was compared with measured AC (MAC) and calculated AC (CAC) methods using region of interest (ROI) and SPM analyses.
RESULTS: The ROI analysis showed that the activity of the TGAC EM PET images strongly correlated with those of the MAC data (y = 0.98x + 0.01, R(2) = 0.96). In addition, no significant difference was observed in the SPM analysis. By contrast, the CAC showed a significantly higher uptake in the deep gray regions compared to the MAC (corrected P < 0.05). The ROI correlation with MAC was worse than with the TGAC (R(2) = 0.84). In SPM analysis for the voxel-wise group comparisons between before and after the induction of deafness, only the TGAC showed equivalent results with the MAC.
CONCLUSIONS: The TGAC was reliable in cat FDG brain PET studies in terms of compatibility with the MAC method. The TGAC might be a useful option for increasing study throughput and decreasing the probability of subject movement. In addition, it might reduce the possible biological effects of long-term anesthesia on the cat brain in investigations using animal-dedicated PET scanners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19949984     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-009-0277-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  39 in total

1.  Scatter and attenuation correction for brain SPECT using attenuation distributions inferred from a head atlas.

Authors:  R Z Stodilka; B J Kemp; F S Prato; A Kertesz; D Kuhl; R L Nicholson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Small animal imaging in drug development.

Authors:  Martin G Pomper; Jae Sung Lee
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.116

3.  Atlas-guided non-uniform attenuation correction in cerebral 3D PET imaging.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Montandon; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-17       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Voxel-based statistical analysis of cerebral glucose metabolism in the rat cortical deafness model by 3D reconstruction of brain from autoradiographic images.

Authors:  Jae Sung Lee; Soon-Hyun Ahn; Dong Soo Lee; Seung Ha Oh; Chong Sun Kim; Jae Min Jeong; Kwang Suk Park; June-Key Chung; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  MicroPET imaging of prostate cancer in LNCAP-SR39TK-GFP mouse xenografts.

Authors:  Honghao Yang; Frank Berger; Chris Tran; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Charles L Sawyers
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  Assessment of microPET performance in analyzing the rat brain under different types of anesthesia: comparison between quantitative data obtained with microPET and ex vivo autoradiography.

Authors:  Akira Matsumura; Shigekazu Mizokawa; Masaaki Tanaka; Yasuhiro Wada; Satoshi Nozaki; Fusao Nakamura; Susumu Shiomi; Hironobu Ochi; Yasuyoshi Watanabe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Assessment of cerebral glucose metabolism in cat deafness model: strategies for improving the voxel-based statistical analysis for animal PET studies.

Authors:  Jin Su Kim; Jae Sung Lee; Min-Hyun Park; Hyejin Kang; Jong Jin Lee; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Ki Chun Im; Dae Hyuk Moon; Sang-Moo Lim; Seung-Ha Oh; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Assessment of myocardial blood flow using 15O-water and 1-11C-acetate in rats with small-animal PET.

Authors:  Pilar Herrero; Joonyoung Kim; Terry L Sharp; John A Engelbach; Jason S Lewis; Robert J Gropler; Michael J Welch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Evaluation of anesthesia effects on [18F]FDG uptake in mouse brain and heart using small animal PET.

Authors:  Hiroshi Toyama; Masanori Ichise; Jeih-San Liow; Douglass C Vines; Nicholas M Seneca; Kendra J Modell; Jurgen Seidel; Michael V Green; Robert B Innis
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients.

Authors:  C Burger; G Goerres; S Schoenes; A Buck; A H R Lonn; G K Von Schulthess
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Integrated whole body MR/PET: where are we?

Authors:  Hye Jin Yoo; Jae Sung Lee; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  Unified Deep Learning-Based Mouse Brain MR Segmentation: Template-Based Individual Brain Positron Emission Tomography Volumes-of-Interest Generation Without Spatial Normalization in Mouse Alzheimer Model.

Authors:  Seung Yeon Seo; Soo-Jong Kim; Jungsu S Oh; Jinwha Chung; Seog-Young Kim; Seung Jun Oh; Segyeong Joo; Jae Seung Kim
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.750

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.