Literature DB >> 19948929

Who gets the liver transplant? The use of responsibility as the tie breaker.

V Thornton1.   

Abstract

Is it possible to invoke the use of moral responsibility as part of the selection criteria in the allocation of livers for transplant? Criticism has been applied to the difficulties inherent in including such a criterion and also the effect that employing such a judgement might have upon the relationship between the physician and patient. However, these criticisms rely on speculation and conjecture and do not relate to all the arguments put forward in favour of applying moral responsibility. None of the present arguments against using moral responsibility in the allocation of livers for transplant are good enough to warrant its dismissal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19948929     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2009.029967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  5 in total

Review 1.  Ethical issues associated with solid organ transplantation and substance use: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lauren Notini; Denitsa Vasileva; Ani Orchanian-Cheff; Daniel Z Buchman
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2019-12

2.  'Are smokers less deserving of expensive treatment? A randomised controlled trial that goes beyond official values'.

Authors:  Joar Björk; Niels Lynøe; Niklas Juth
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Responsibility and the recursion problem.

Authors:  Ben Davies
Journal:  Ratio (Oxf)       Date:  2021-11-18

4.  Moral responsibility for (un)healthy behaviour.

Authors:  Rebecca C H Brown
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Healthcare, Responsibility and Golden Opportunities.

Authors:  Gabriel De Marco; Thomas Douglas; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Ethical Theory Moral Pract       Date:  2021-06-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.