Literature DB >> 19948523

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial.

Gianluca Lista1, Francesca Castoldi, Paola Fontana, Irene Daniele, Francesco Cavigioli, Samantha Rossi, Diego Mancuso, Roberta Reali.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical course, respiratory outcomes and markers of inflammation in preterm infants with moderate respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) assigned from birth to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or bi-level NCPAP.
METHODS: A total of 40 infants with a gestational age (GA) of 28-34 weeks (<35 weeks' GA), affected by moderate RDS, were considered eligible and were randomised to NCPAP (group A; n=20, CPAP level=6 cm H(2)O) or to bi-level NCPAP (group B; n=20, lower CPAP level=4.5 cm H(2)O, higher CPAP level=8 cm H(2)O), provided with variable flow devices. Inflammatory response was the primary outcome; serum cytokines were measured on days 1 and 7 of life. Length of ventilation, oxygen dependency, need for intubation and occurrence of air leaks were considered as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: Infants showed similar characteristics at birth (group A vs group B: GA 30.3+/-2 vs 30.2+/-2 weeks, birth weight 1429+/-545 vs 1411+/-560 g) and showed similar serum cytokine levels at all times. Group A underwent longer respiratory support (6.2+/-2 days vs 3.8+/-1 days, p=0.025), longer O(2) dependency (13.8+/-8 days vs 6.5+/-4 days, p=0.027) and was discharged later (GA at discharge 36.7+/-2.5 weeks vs 35.6+/-1.2 weeks, p=0.02). All infants survived. No bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) or neurological disorders occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Bi-level NCPAP was associated with better respiratory outcomes versus NCPAP, and allowed earlier discharge, inducing the same changes in the cytokine levels. It was found to be well tolerated and safe in the study population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19948523     DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.169219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  20 in total

1.  Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus bi-level positive pressure ventilation in premature infants with respiratory failure: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Wenqian Chen; Zhiqing Chen; Shuhua Lai; Wenhong Cai; Yunfeng Lin
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.340

2.  Evaluation of respiratory function monitoring at the resuscitation of prematurely born infants.

Authors:  Antonia Milner; Vadivelam Murthy; Prashanth Bhat; Grenville Fox; Morag E Campbell; Anthony D Milner; Anne Greenough
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karel O'Brien; Craig Campbell; Leanne Brown; Lisa Wenger; Vibhuti Shah
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.125

4.  Severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia improved by noninvasive positive pressure ventilation: a case report.

Authors:  Christian Mann; Walter Bär
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2011-09-06

5.  EXTUBATE: a randomised controlled trial of nasal biphasic positive airway pressure vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure following extubation in infants less than 30 weeks' gestation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Suresh Victor
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Plasma cytokine levels fall in preterm newborn infants on nasal CPAP with early respiratory distress.

Authors:  Clarissa Gutierrez Carvalho; Rita de Cassia Silveira; Eurico Camargo Neto; Renato Soibelmann Procianoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Non-invasive duo positive airway pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Arash Malakian; Mohammad Reza Aramesh; Mina Agahin; Masoud Dehdashtian
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  The role of surfactant in respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Christopher Cheng-Hwa Ma; Sze Ma
Journal:  Open Respir Med J       Date:  2012-07-13

Review 9.  Ventilator-induced lung injury in preterm infants.

Authors:  Clarissa Gutierrez Carvalho; Rita C Silveira; Renato Soibelmann Procianoy
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

10.  A comparison of surfactant administration through i-gel and ET-tube in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in newborns weighing more than 2000 grams.

Authors:  Alireza Sadeghnia; Mozhgan Tanhaei; Majid Mohammadizadeh; Mohammad Nemati
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2014-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.