Literature DB >> 1994839

Field trials of the Baby Check score card in hospital.

A J Thornton1, C J Morley, T J Cole, S J Green, K A Walker, J M Rennie.   

Abstract

The Baby Check score card was used by junior paediatric doctors to assess 262 babies under 6 months old presenting to hospital. The duty registrar and two consultants independently graded the severity of each baby's illness without knowledge of the Baby Check score. The registrars assessed the babies at presentation while the consultants reviewed the notes. The consultants and registrars agreed about the need for hospital admission only about 75% of the time. The score's sensitivity and predictive values were similar to those of the registrars' grading. The score's specificity was 87%. Babies with serious diagnosis scored high, while minor illnesses scored low. The predictive value for requiring hospital admission increased with the score, rising to 100% for scores of 20 or more. The appropriate use of Baby Check should improve the detection of serious illness. It could also reduce the number of babies admitted with minor illness, without putting them at increased risk.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1994839      PMCID: PMC1793198          DOI: 10.1136/adc.66.1.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  5 in total

1.  Field trials of the Baby Check score card in general practice.

Authors:  C J Morley; A J Thornton; S J Green; T J Cole
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Baby Check: a scoring system to grade the severity of acute systemic illness in babies under 6 months old.

Authors:  C J Morley; A J Thornton; T J Cole; P H Hewson; M A Fowler
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Field trials of the Baby Check score card: mothers scoring their babies at home.

Authors:  A J Thornton; C J Morley; S J Green; T J Cole; K A Walker; J M Bonnett
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance.

Authors:  M S Kramer; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.875

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  How sick the baby?

Authors:  C Watkins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-11

2.  Baby Check and the Avon infant mortality study.

Authors:  T J Cole; R E Gilbert; P J Fleming; C J Morley; P T Rudd; P J Berry
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Field trials of the Baby Check score card in general practice.

Authors:  C J Morley; A J Thornton; S J Green; T J Cole
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Baby Check: a scoring system to grade the severity of acute systemic illness in babies under 6 months old.

Authors:  C J Morley; A J Thornton; T J Cole; P H Hewson; M A Fowler
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Field trials of the Baby Check score card: mothers scoring their babies at home.

Authors:  A J Thornton; C J Morley; S J Green; T J Cole; K A Walker; J M Bonnett
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Doppler and fetal growth retardation.

Authors:  S Kempley
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.747

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.