Literature DB >> 19947795

Factorial invariance of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale across gender.

Susan C South1, Robert F Krueger, William G Iacono.   

Abstract

The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS; G. B. Spanier, 1976) is the most widely used inventory of relationship satisfaction in the social sciences, yet the question of whether it is measuring the same concept in men and women has never been addressed. In the current study, the authors examined the factor structure of the DAS in a sample of 900 currently married couples who participated in the Minnesota Twin Family Study. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to a second-order factor solution with Spanier's four factors (Dyadic Consensus, Dyadic Satisfaction, Dyadic Cohesion, Affectional Expression) loading on one higher order factor (Relationship Adjustment), to test for measurement invariance across gender. The second-order solution was relatively invariant across gender, even when taking into account the nonindependent nature of the data. This suggests that the best conceptualization of the DAS is one of a gender-invariant measure of marital adjustment with four distinct subfactors and that differences between men and women on any of these constructs can be interpreted by both clinicians and researchers as true mean differences rather than measurement bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19947795      PMCID: PMC2788300          DOI: 10.1037/a0017572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  7 in total

1.  Behavioral disinhibition and the development of substance-use disorders: findings from the Minnesota Twin Family Study.

Authors:  W G Iacono; S R Carlson; J Taylor; I J Elkins; M McGue
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  1999

2.  A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research.

Authors:  J L Horn; J J McArdle
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1992 Autumn-Winter       Impact factor: 1.645

3.  Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model.

Authors:  Stéphane Sabourin; Pierre Valois; Yvan Lussier
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2005-03

Review 4.  Evidence-based approaches to assessing couple distress.

Authors:  Douglas K Snyder; Richard E Heyman; Stephen N Haynes
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2005-09

5.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Variability in outcome and clinical significance of behavioral marital therapy: a reanalysis of outcome data.

Authors:  N S Jacobson; W C Follette; D Revenstorf; D H Baucom; K Hahlweg; G Margolin
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1984-08

7.  Traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy for significantly and chronically distressed married couples.

Authors:  Andrew Christensen; David C Atkins; Sara Berns; Jennifer Wheeler; Donald H Baucom; Lorelei E Simpson
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2004-04
  7 in total
  15 in total

1.  Understanding general and specific connections between psychopathology and marital distress: a model based approach.

Authors:  Susan C South; Robert F Krueger; William G Iacono
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2011-09-26

2.  Self- and surrogate-reported communication functioning in aphasia.

Authors:  Patrick J Doyle; William D Hula; Shannon N Austermann Hula; Clement A Stone; Julie L Wambaugh; Katherine B Ross; James G Schumacher
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Marital quality and psychological adjustment among mothers of children with ASD: cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships.

Authors:  Paul R Benson; Joanne Kersh
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2011-12

4.  Relationship quality and levels of depression and anxiety in a large population-based survey.

Authors:  Liana S Leach; Peter Butterworth; Sarah C Olesen; Andrew Mackinnon
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Gender Differences in the Structure of Marital Quality.

Authors:  Christopher R Beam; Katherine Marcus; Eric Turkheimer; Robert E Emery
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Partner accommodation in posttraumatic stress disorder: initial testing of the Significant Others' Responses to Trauma Scale (SORTS).

Authors:  Steffany J Fredman; Valerie Vorstenbosch; Anne C Wagner; Alexandra Macdonald; Candice M Monson
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2014-04-13

7.  Disentangling the relative contribution of parental antisociality and family discord to child disruptive disorders.

Authors:  Marina A Bornovalova; Ryan Blazei; Stephen H Malone; Matt McGue; William G Iacono
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2012-08-13

8.  Psychometric properties of the Marital Adjustment Scale during cognitive therapy for depression: New research opportunities.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Vittengl; Lee Anna Clark; Michael E Thase; Robin B Jarrett
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2020-08-27

9.  Romantic Relationship Satisfaction Moderates the Etiology of Adult Personality.

Authors:  Susan C South; Robert F Krueger; Irene J Elkins; William G Iacono; Matt McGue
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Parental Depression and Cooperative Coparenting: A Longitudinal and Dyadic Approach.

Authors:  Deadric T Williams
Journal:  Fam Relat       Date:  2018-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.