Literature DB >> 19947672

Comparative study of multireference perturbative theories for ground and excited states.

Mark R Hoffmann1, Dipayan Datta, Sanghamitra Das, Debashis Mukherjee, Agnes Szabados, Zoltán Rolik, Péter R Surján.   

Abstract

Three recently developed multireference perturbation theories (PTs)-generalized Van Vleck PT (GVVPT), state-specific multireference PT (SS-MRPT), and multiconfiguration PT (MCPT)-are briefly reviewed and compared numerically on representative examples, at the second order of approximations. We compute the dissociation potential curve of the LiH molecule and the BeH(2) system at various geometries, both in the ground and in the first excited singlet state. Furthermore, the ethylene twisting process is studied. Both Møller-Plesset (MP) and Epstein-Nesbet partition are used for MCPT and SS-MRPT, while GVVPT uses MP partitioning. An important thrust in our comparative study is to ascertain the degree of interplay of dynamical and nondynamical correlation for both ground and excited states. The same basis set and the same set of orbitals are used in all calculations to keep artifactual differences away when comparing the results. Nonparallelity error is used as a measure of the performance of the respective theories. Significant differences among the three methods appear when an intruder state is present. Additionally, difficulties arise (a) in MCPT when the choice of a pivot determinant becomes problematic, and (b) in SS-MRPT when there are small coefficients of the model function and there is implicit division by these coefficients, which generates a potential instability of the solutions. Ways to alleviate these latter shortcomings are suggested.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19947672     DOI: 10.1063/1.3265769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  1 in total

1.  A Jeziorski-Monkhorst fully uncontracted multi-reference perturbative treatment. I. Principles, second-order versions, and tests on ground state potential energy curves.

Authors:  Emmanuel Giner; Celestino Angeli; Yann Garniron; Anthony Scemama; Jean-Paul Malrieu
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.