Literature DB >> 19947349

Active surveillance for low-risk localized prostate cancer.

Michael C Large1, Scott E Eggener.   

Abstract

The management of localized prostate cancer in an otherwise healthy male is complex, evolving, and largely consists of three modalities: surgery, radiation, and active surveillance. In this review, we summarize contemporary data pertaining to active surveillance, a strategy in which patients with low-risk cancer characteristics undergo monitoring at regular intervals. Treatment is initiated following evidence of cancer features associated with a higher risk of progression. Multiple clinical experiences suggest active surveillance is a safe and appropriate strategy for select patients. Most definitions of low-risk cancer include a variable combination of: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or =10 ng/mL, clinical stage T1-T2a, biopsy Gleason score < or =6, and three or fewer positive biopsy cores. Although older patients or those with signficant competing medical risks typically are not treated with surgery or radiation, active surveillance should also be considered and explained to well-selected healthy patients otherwise considering primary therapy. Due to significant concerns about clinical understaging, eligible patients should consider a repeat biopsy prior to selecting active surveillance. Short- to intermediate-term follow-up suggests active surveillance is associated with favorable overall outcomes, including for those undergoing delayed treatment, and has a relatively low risk of leading to incurable prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19947349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)        ISSN: 0890-9091            Impact factor:   2.990


  4 in total

1.  Impact of immediate TRUS rebiopsy in a patient cohort considering active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andre C King; Andrew Livermore; Timo A J Laurila; Wei Huang; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  The effect of capped biparametric magnetic resonance imaging slots on weekly prostate cancer imaging workload.

Authors:  Nikita Sushentsev; Iztok Caglic; Evis Sala; Nadeem Shaida; Rhys A Slough; Bruno Carmo; Vasily Kozlov; Vincent J Gnanapragasam; Tristan Barrett
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Modern imaging and image-guided treatments of the prostate gland: MR and ablation for cancer and prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  João Lopes Dias; Tiago Bilhim
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-08-14

4.  The accuracy of prostate cancer localization diagnosed on transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy compared to 3-dimensional transperineal approach.

Authors:  Kevin Krughoff; Khadijah Eid; Jason Phillips; Diliana Stoimenova; Daniel Smith; Colin O'Donnell; E David Crawford; Al Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2013-12-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.