Literature DB >> 19947033

Home uterine activity monitoring: an evidence review of its utility in multiple gestations.

James P Reichmann1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the medical evidence regarding the application of home uterine activity monitoring for multiple gestations. STUDY
DESIGN: All of the published peer-reviewed articles on the topic were assembled and assigned a level of evidence based on research design. The search uncovered 9 articles, including 3 Level I randomized, controlled trials; 1 level II matched cohort trial; and 5 level III case series.
RESULTS: The first 5 trials all showed promising results for home uterine activity monitoring applied to multiple gestations. Ultimately, however, 14 years after the introduction of home uterine activity monitoring, the largest randomized, controlled trial was published, and it demonstrated that pregnancy outcomes were identical for patients with home uterine activity monitoring and patients receiving weekly calls from a nurse. A subsequent National Institute of Child Health and Human Development published trial may provide a clue as to why the large, randomized, controlled trial demonstrated no difference.
CONCLUSION: Contractions in multiple gestations are not predictive of preterm birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19947033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  3 in total

Review 1.  Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour.

Authors:  Christine Urquhart; Rosemary Currell; Francoise Harlow; Liz Callow
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-15

Review 2.  Prophylactic oral betamimetics for reducing preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy.

Authors:  Waralak Yamasmit; Surasith Chaithongwongwatthana; Jorge E Tolosa; Sompop Limpongsanurak; Leonardo Pereira; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-08

3.  A comparison of the contractile properties of myometrium from singleton and twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Peter Turton; Sarah Arrowsmith; Jonathan Prescott; Celia Ballard; Leanne Bricker; James Neilson; Susan Wray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.