Literature DB >> 19946885

Hypothetical versus real preferences: results from an opportunistic field experiment.

Stirling Bryan1, Sue Jowett.   

Abstract

Over recent years there has been renewed interest in cost-benefit analysis (CBA) in health care but the 'hypothetical bias' concern (i.e. the belief that WTP values overstate real preferences) is a remaining anxiety. This paper reports new empirical data comparing hypothetical and real preferences in a health care context, using the clinical setting of patient self-management (PSM) of anticoagulation (warfarin) therapy. The data offer considerable support for the use of WTP and CBAs in a self-management health care context; the hypothetical bias hypothesis is not supported by our data. The generalisability of these results to other health care settings needs to be explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19946885     DOI: 10.1002/hec.1563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  3 in total

Review 1.  Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Marion Haas; Jane Hall; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  General Population vs. Patient Preferences in Anticoagulant Therapy: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Mehdi Najafzadeh; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Niteesh K Choudhry; Jerry Avorn; Joshua J Gagne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE).

Authors:  Mehdi Najafzadeh; Karissa M Johnston; Stuart J Peacock; Joseph M Connors; Marco A Marra; Larry D Lynd; Carlo A Marra
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.