Literature DB >> 19946079

Enhanced visual fields in hammerhead sharks.

D M McComb1, T C Tricas, S M Kajiura.   

Abstract

Several factors that influence the evolution of the unusual head morphology of hammerhead sharks (family Sphyrnidae) are proposed but few are empirically tested. In this study we tested the 'enhanced binocular field' hypothesis (that proposes enhanced frontal binocularity) by comparison of the visual fields of three hammerhead species: the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo, the scalloped hammerhead shark, Sphyrna lewini, and the winghead shark, Eusphyra blochii, with that of two carcharhinid species: the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris, and the blacknose shark, Carcharhinus acronotus. Additionally, eye rotation and head yaw were quantified to determine if species compensate for large blind areas anterior to the head. The winghead shark possessed the largest anterior binocular overlap (48 deg.) and was nearly four times larger than that of the lemon (10 deg.) and blacknose (11 deg.) sharks. The binocular overlap in the scalloped hammerhead sharks (34 deg.) was greater than the bonnethead sharks (13 deg.) and carcharhinid species; however, the bonnethead shark did not differ from the carcharhinids. These results indicate that binocular overlap has increased with lateral head expansion in hammerhead sharks. The hammerhead species did not demonstrate greater eye rotation in the anterior or posterior direction. However, both the scalloped hammerhead and bonnethead sharks exhibited greater head yaw during swimming (16.9 deg. and 15.6 deg., respectively) than the lemon (15.1 deg.) and blacknose (15.0 deg.) sharks, indicating a behavioral compensation for the anterior blind area. This study illustrates the larger binocular overlap in hammerhead species relative to their carcharhinid sister taxa and is consistent with the 'enhanced binocular field' hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19946079     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.032615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

Review 1.  Eye movements of vertebrates and their relation to eye form and function.

Authors:  Michael F Land
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Vision in two cyprinid fish: implications for collective behavior.

Authors:  Diana Pita; Bret A Moore; Luke P Tyrrell; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Does nocturnality drive binocular vision? Octodontine rodents as a case study.

Authors:  Tomas Vega-Zuniga; Felipe S Medina; Felipe Fredes; Claudio Zuniga; Daniel Severín; Adrián G Palacios; Harvey J Karten; Jorge Mpodozis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Temporal niche partitioning as a novel mechanism promoting co-existence of sympatric predators in marine systems.

Authors:  Karissa O Lear; Nicholas M Whitney; John J Morris; Adrian C Gleiss
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A first observation of spermatogenesis in mature male scalloped hammerheads (Sphyrna lewini) from Zinkwazi, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Authors:  Helené J Coetzee; Kristina Naidoo; Ina Wagenaar
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.794

6.  Multisensory integration and behavioral plasticity in sharks from different ecological niches.

Authors:  Jayne M Gardiner; Jelle Atema; Robert E Hueter; Philip J Motta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Linking sensory biology and fisheries bycatch reduction in elasmobranch fishes: a review with new directions for research.

Authors:  Laura K Jordan; John W Mandelman; D Michelle McComb; Sonja V Fordham; John K Carlson; Timothy B Werner
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.079

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.