Literature DB >> 19945839

Comparison of five organic wastes regarding their behaviour during composting: part 2, nitrogen dynamic.

A de Guardia1, P Mallard, C Teglia, A Marin, C Le Pape, M Launay, J C Benoist, C Petiot.   

Abstract

This paper aimed to compare household waste, separated pig solids, food waste, pig slaughterhouse sludge and green algae regarding processes ruling nitrogen dynamic during composting. For each waste, three composting simulations were performed in parallel in three similar reactors (300 L), each one under a constant aeration rate. The aeration flows applied were comprised between 100 and 1100 L/h. The initial waste and the compost were characterized through the measurements of their contents in dry matter, total carbon, Kjeldahl and total ammoniacal nitrogen, nitrite and nitrate. Kjeldahl and total ammoniacal nitrogen and nitrite and nitrate were measured in leachates and in condensates too. Ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions were monitored in continue. The cumulated emissions in ammonia and in nitrous oxide were given for each waste and at each aeration rate. The paper focused on process of ammonification and on transformations and transfer of total ammoniacal nitrogen. The parameters of nitrous oxide emissions were not investigated. The removal rate of total Kjeldahl nitrogen was shown being closely tied to the ammonification rate. Ammonification was modelled thanks to the calculation of the ratio of biodegradable carbon to organic nitrogen content of the biodegradable fraction. The wastes were shown to differ significantly regarding their ammonification ability. Nitrogen balances were calculated by subtracting nitrogen losses from nitrogen removed from material. Defaults in nitrogen balances were assumed to correspond to conversion of nitrate even nitrite into molecular nitrogen and then to the previous conversion by nitrification of total ammoniacal nitrogen. The pool of total ammoniacal nitrogen, i.e. total ammoniacal nitrogen initially contained in waste plus total ammoniacal nitrogen released by ammonification, was calculated for each experiment. Then, this pool was used as the referring amount in the calculation of the rates of accumulation, stripping and nitrification of total ammoniacal nitrogen. Separated pig solids were characterised by a high ability to accumulate total ammoniacal nitrogen. Whatever the waste, the striping rate depended mostly on the aeration rate and on the pool concentration in biofilm. The nitrification rate was observed as all the higher as the concentration in total ammoniacal nitrogen in the initial waste was low. Thus, household waste and green algae exhibited the highest nitrification rates. This result could mean that in case of low concentrations in total ammoniacal nitrogen, a nitrifying biomass was already developed and that this biomass consumed it. In contrast, in case of high concentrations, this could traduce some difficulties for nitrifying microorganisms to develop. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19945839     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  3 in total

1.  Physicochemical and fertility characteristics of microalgal soil ameliorants using harvested cyanobacterial microalgal sludge from a freshwater ecosystem, Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Chang Hyuk Ahn; Saeromi Lee; Jae Roh Park; Hong-Kyu Ahn; Seongsim Yoon; Kyoungphile Nam; Jin Chul Joo
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Spatial nitrifications of microbial processes during composting of swine, cow and chicken manure.

Authors:  Ke Wang; Weiguang Li; Xiangkun Li; Nanqi Ren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Impact of Composting Methods on Nitrogen Retention and Losses during Dairy Manure Composting.

Authors:  Xiao Yang; Enke Liu; Xinmeng Zhu; Hongyuan Wang; Hongbin Liu; Xiu Liu; Wenyi Dong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.