Literature DB >> 19945677

Use of homeopathic preparations in experimental studies with healthy plants.

Vera Majewsky1, Sebastian Arlt, Devika Shah, Claudia Scherr, Tim Jäger, Lucietta Betti, Grazia Trebbi, Leoni Bonamin, Peter Klocke, Stephan Baumgartner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The last comprehensive review of experimental research on effects of homeopathic treatments on plants was published in 1984, and lacked formal predefined criteria to assess study quality. Since then several new studies with more advanced methods have been published.
OBJECTIVES: To compile a review of the literature on basic research in homeopathy with healthy plants with particular reference to studies investigating specific effects of homeopathic remedies.
METHODS: The literature search included English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish publications from 1920 to April 2009, using predefined selection criteria. We included experiments with healthy whole plants, seeds, plant parts and cells. The outcomes had to be measured by established procedures and statistically evaluated. We developed a Manuscript Information Score (MIS) and included only publications which provided enough information for proper interpretation (MIS>or=5). A formalised Study Methods Evaluation Procedure (SMEP) was used to evaluate these studies, and the subgroup of studies with adequate controls to identify specific effects.
RESULTS: A total of 86 studies in 79 publications was identified, 43 studies included statistics, 29 had MIS>or=5, and 15 studies investigated the specificity of homeopathic preparations. Specific effects of decimal, centesimal and fifty millesimal potencies were found including dilution levels far beyond the Avogadro number. In consecutive series of potencies only some of the tested potencies showed effects. There were many individual studies with diverse methods and very few reproduction trials.
CONCLUSIONS: Healthy plant models seem an useful approach to investigate basic research questions about the specificity of homeopathic preparations. More investigations with more advanced methods are recommended, especially in the sectors of potentisation techniques, effective potency levels and conditions for reproducibility. Systematic negative control experiments should become a routine procedure to control the stability of the experimental systems.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19945677     DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2009.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Homeopathy        ISSN: 1475-4916            Impact factor:   1.444


  5 in total

1.  Rats Born to Mothers Treated with Dexamethasone 15 cH Present Changes in Modulation of Inflammatory Process.

Authors:  Leoni V Bonamin; Cristiane Landi de Moraes; Fernanda Sanches; Thayná Neves Cardoso; Cesar Sato; Claudemir Duran Filho; Lucienne C Martini
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Differences in Median Ultraviolet Light Transmissions of Serial Homeopathic Dilutions of Copper Sulfate, Hypericum perforatum, and Sulfur.

Authors:  Sabine D Klein; Annegret Sandig; Stephan Baumgartner; Ursula Wolf
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Development of a biocrystallisation assay for examining effects of homeopathic preparations using cress seedlings.

Authors:  S Baumgartner; P Doesburg; C Scherr; J-O Andersen
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Extreme sensitivity of gene expression in human SH-SY5Y neurocytes to ultra-low doses of Gelsemium sempervirens.

Authors:  Marta Marzotto; Debora Olioso; Maurizio Brizzi; Paola Tononi; Mirco Cristofoletti; Paolo Bellavite
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.659

Review 5.  Physicochemical Investigations of Homeopathic Preparations: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis-Part 1.

Authors:  Sabine D Klein; Sandra Würtenberger; Ursula Wolf; Stephan Baumgartner; Alexander Tournier
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.579

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.