Literature DB >> 19945307

Intermediate-differentiated invasive (pT1 G2) penile cancer--oncological outcome and follow-up.

Boris Schlenker1, Derya Tilki, Christian Gratzke, Michael Seitz, Oliver Reich, Peter Schneede, Christian G Stief, Edwin Hungerhuber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND AIMS: Due to the low prevalence of penile cancer, little evidence exists on the metastatic potential and the ideal treatment strategies in intermediate-differentiated invasive (pT1 G2) penile cancer. The current study aimed to analyze the oncologic outcome of patients with penile carcinoma with long-term follow-up in a single-center study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 38 patients with histologically proven T1 G2 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis were included. Only the 'classic' subtype was analyzed. Treatment of the primary tumor was Nd:YAG laser-therapy, excision, or partial amputation. Follow-up was performed according to EAU guidelines (2004).
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 78.1 months (range: 9-285 months). Local recurrence was seen in 12 patients (31.6%), but was not correlated with disease related death (P = 0.7944). Rate of local recurrence was not dependent on treatment modality (P = 0.3481); 13 patients died, accounting for a disease related survival rate of 81.6% during observation period. Positive lymph nodes were seen in 28.9% of patients and were significantly correlated with disease related death (P = 0.00004). Clinically enlarged inguinal lymph nodes were not correlated with histologically confirmed positive lymph nodes (P = 0.5785).
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with T1 G2 penile cancer, organ preserving therapy appears to be a suitable treatment option. In our series, nearly one third of patients developed inguinal lymph node metastases, which highlights the potential benefit of surgical staging. Larger prospective multicenter studies are needed to define the best treatment strategy for intermediate-differentiated invasive penile cancer.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19945307     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  3 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and controversies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Majid Shabbir; Oliver Kayes; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  What Is the Most Effective Management of the Primary Tumor in Men with Invasive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Available Treatment Options and Their Outcomes.

Authors:  Vasileios I Sakalis; Riccardo Campi; Lenka Barreto; Herney Garcia Perdomo; Isabella Greco; Łukasz Zapala; Mithun Kailavasan; Tiago Antunes-Lopes; Jack David Marcus; Kenneth Manzie; John Osborne; Benjamin Ayres; Luc M F Moonen; Andrea Necchi; Juanita Crook; Pedro Oliveira; Lance C Pagliaro; Chris Protzel; Arie S Parnham; Maarten Albersen; Curtis A Pettaway; Philippe E Spiess; Scott T Tagawa; R Bryan Rumble; Oscar R Brouwer
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-02

3.  [Focal therapy for penile cancer].

Authors:  O W Hakenberg; C Protzel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.