Literature DB >> 19945102

Health and cost consequences of surgical versus conservative treatment for a comminuted proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients.

T Fjalestad1, M Ø Hole, J J Jørgensen, K Strømsøe, I S Kristiansen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the costs and health outcome for surgical and conservative treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures.
DESIGN: This study is a randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 50 patients aged 60 or older admitted to hospital with a severely displaced three- or four-part fracture.
INTERVENTIONS: The patients were treated surgically with an angular stable interlocking implant (25 patients) or conservative treatment (25 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The outcomes measured included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and societal costs.
RESULTS: At 12 months' follow-up, the mean difference in the number of QALYs was 0.027 (95% confidence interval (CI)=-0.025, 0.078) while the mean difference in total health-care costs was 597 euro in favour of surgery (95% CI=-5291, 3777).
CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in QALYs or costs between surgical and conservative treatment of severe displaced proximal humeral fractures. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19945102     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  27 in total

Review 1.  [Fractures of the humerus head].

Authors:  M Jaeger; K Izadpanah; D Maier; K Reising; P C Strohm; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures: operative versus non-operative treatment--a 2-year extension of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tore Fjalestad; Margrethe Øye Hole
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-01-11

Review 3.  Cost-utility studies in upper limb orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review of published literature.

Authors:  P V Rajan; Rameez A Qudsi; G S M Dyer; E Losina
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  [Limitations of reconstruction - prostheses].

Authors:  M Jaeger; D Maier; K Izadpanah; P Strohm; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  [Proximal humerus fracture: is fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis superior to conservative treatment?].

Authors:  C Krettek; U Wiebking
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  [Fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly : Osteosynthesis versus joint replacement].

Authors:  G Gradl; H-C Pape; M Tingart; D Arbab
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Conservative treatment of periprosthetic humeral fractures years after cemented fracture prostheses : A case series].

Authors:  H Siekmann; T S Bowen; M Huschak; F Radetzki; C Bauer; J Walther
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  [Indication for primary fracture prosthesis of the shoulder].

Authors:  C Kirchhoff; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 9.  ESTES recommendations on proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Klaus W Wendt; Martin Jaeger; Jan Verbruggen; Stefaan Nijs; Hans-Jörg Oestern; Richard Kdolsky; Radko Komadina
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  Operative vs non-operative management of displaced proximal humeral fractures in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Santa Rabi; Nathan Evaniew; Sheila A Sprague; Mohit Bhandari; Gerard P Slobogean
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.