Literature DB >> 19944983

The case for primary placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters in acute kidney injury.

Lee Coryell1, Jason P Lott, S William Stavropoulos, Jeffrey I Mondschein, Aalpen A Patel, Andrew Kwak, Michael C Soulen, Jeffrey A Solomon, Richard D Shlansky-Goldberg, Alexander A Nemeth, Sidney Kobrin, Michael Rudnick, Scott O Trerotola.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Nontunneled hemodialysis catheters (NTDCs) are widely used for initial hemodialysis access in new-onset renal failure. The National Kidney Foundation recommends NTDC use for hemodialysis duration of less than 1 week in acute kidney injury because of the increased infection risk compared with tunneled hemodialysis catheters (TDCs) with longer use. The present study was performed to determine whether primary placement of TDCs in this setting is more appropriate, and whether there are predictors of recovery of renal function in less than 1 week.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the authors' practice, patients referred to the interventional radiology unit in whom no contraindications exist receive a TDC; 76 patients who received a primary TDC for acute kidney injury and who eventually recovered renal function were retrospectively reviewed herein. Causes of renal failure, various renal function parameters, and demographics were collected, as were TDC dwell times, in an effort to determine predictors of recovery and/or extended duration of use.
RESULTS: Mean TDC dwell time in patients who eventually recovered from acute kidney injury was 34 days; only 15 of 76 (20%) recovered within 1 week. At TDC placement, there were no significant differences between patients who recovered in less than (vs greater than) 1 week.
CONCLUSIONS: The present results support primary placement of TDCs in patients with acute kidney injury who require hemodialysis and in whom no contraindications exist, as no predictors of recovery of renal function in less than 1 week were identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19944983     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  6 in total

1.  Use of an ECG-based confirmatory technique for bedside placement of reverse-tunneled cuffed dialysis catheters in three morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Peter R Bream; Everett Gu
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Non-tunneled versus tunneled dialysis catheters for acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mallika L Mendu; Megan F May; Arnaud D Kaze; Dionne A Graham; Salena Cui; Margaret E Chen; Naomi Shin; Ayal A Aizer; Sushrut S Waikar
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Availability of right femoral vein as a route for tunneled hemodialysis catheterization.

Authors:  Mitsutoshi Shindo; Hiroaki Takemae; Takafumi Kubo; Masatsugu Soeno; Tetsuo Ando; Yoshiyuki Morishita
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-06-28

4.  Bedside Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter Placement in Patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Austin D Williams; Michael Qaqish; Jaafar Elnagar; Lia Michos; Sebastian Nantermet; Robert Meisner; Vincent DiGiovanni; Alexander Uribe
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 5.  Central Venous Catheters for Hemodialysis-the Myth and the Evidence.

Authors:  Mohammad Ahsan Sohail; Tushar J Vachharajani; Evamaria Anvari
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2021-10-11

Review 6.  Renal replacement therapies for infants and children in the ICU.

Authors:  Keia R Sanderson; Lyndsay A Harshman
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.893

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.