Literature DB >> 19944128

Eco-, geno- and human toxicology of bio-active nanoparticles for biomedical applications.

Johan Robbens1, Caroline Vanparys, Ingrid Nobels, Ronny Blust, Karen Van Hoecke, Colin Janssen, Karel De Schamphelaere, Kathleen Roland, Gersande Blanchard, Frédéric Silvestre, Virginie Gillardin, Patrick Kestemont, Roel Anthonissen, Olivier Toussaint, Sébastien Vankoningsloo, Christelle Saout, Ernesto Alfaro-Moreno, Peter Hoet, Laetitia Gonzalez, Peter Dubruel, Paul Troisfontaines.   

Abstract

Gene delivery has become an increasingly important strategy for treating a variety of human diseases, including infections, genetic disorders and tumours. To avoid the difficulties of using viral carriers, more and more non-viral gene delivery nanoparticles are developed. Among these new approaches polyethylene imine (PEI) is currently considered as one of the most effective polymer based method solution and considered as the gold standard. The toxicity of nanoparticles is a major concern when used for medical application. In this study we chose two nanoparticles for an in depth toxicological and ecotoxicological evaluation, one well characterized, PEI, and another novel polymer, poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA). In the present study we have assessed the toxicity of these cation nanoparticles as such and of the polyplexes - nanoparticles covered with DNA. As these nanoparticles are also frequently used in high volumes in various industries and as such may enter in the environment, we also made an initial assessment of ecotoxicological effects assessment. The following nanoparticles related aspects have been studied during the project: development and characterization, ecotoxicity, general toxicity and specific toxicity. To this end a battery of different tests was used. The conclusion of these tests is that toxicity is varying between different nanoparticles and between different DNA covering ratios. In general, in the different systems tested, the PEI polymer is more toxic than the PDMAEMA polymer. The same difference is seen for the polyplexes and the higher the charge ratio, the more toxic are the polyplexes. Our study also clearly shows the need for a broad spectrum of toxicity assays for a comprehensive risk assessment. Our study has performed such a comprehensive analysis of two biomedical nanoparticles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19944128     DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  4 in total

1.  Albumin-based nanoparticles as magnetic resonance contrast agents: II. Physicochemical characterisation of purified and standardised nanoparticles.

Authors:  A A Abdelmoez; G C Thurner; E A Wallnöfer; N Klammsteiner; C Kremser; H Talasz; M Mrakovcic; E Fröhlich; W Jaschke; P Debbage
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.304

2.  On the pH-responsive, charge-selective, polymer-brush-mediated transport probed by traditional and scanning fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  C R Daniels; L J Tauzin; E Foster; R C Advincula; C F Landes
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Influence of surface charge on the potential toxicity of PLGA nanoparticles towards Calu-3 cells.

Authors:  Simona Mura; Herve Hillaireau; Julien Nicolas; Benjamin Le Droumaguet; Claire Gueutin; Sandrine Zanna; Nicolas Tsapis; Elias Fattal
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2011-10-26

Review 4.  Mechanisms Underlying Cytotoxicity Induced by Engineered Nanomaterials: A Review of In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Daniele R Nogueira; Montserrat Mitjans; Clarice M B Rolim; M Pilar Vinardell
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.076

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.