Literature DB >> 19944116

What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation.

Tirta Susilo1, Elinor McKone, Mark Edwards.   

Abstract

Recent evidence has shown that face space represents facial identity information using two-pool opponent coding. Here we ask whether the shape of the monotonic neural response functions underlying such coding is linear (i.e. face space codes all equal-sized physical changes with equal sensitivity) or nonlinear (e.g. face space shows greater coding sensitivity around the average face). Using adaptation aftereffects and pairwise discrimination tasks, our results for face attributes of eye height and mouth height demonstrate linear shape; including for bizarre faces far outside the normal range. We discuss how linear coding explains some results in the previous literature, including failures to find that adaptation enhances face discrimination, and suggest possible reasons why face space can maintain detailed coding of values far outside the normal range. We also discuss specific nonlinear coding models needed to explain other findings, and conclude face space appears to use a mixture of linear and nonlinear representations. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19944116     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Intensity dependence in high-level facial expression adaptation aftereffect.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; K Lira Yoon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

2.  Amplitude modulation encoding in the auditory cortex: comparisons between the primary and middle lateral belt regions.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Mamiko Niwa; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  From single cells to social perception.

Authors:  Nick E Barraclough; David I Perrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Not just the norm: exemplar-based models also predict face aftereffects.

Authors:  David A Ross; Mickael Deroche; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

Review 6.  Visual adaptation and face perception.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Donald I A MacLeod
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  A computational account of the mechanisms underlying face perception biases in depression.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Rochelle A Stewart; Sanaz Hosseini; Jason Hays; Christopher G Beevers
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2021-07

8.  Are high-level aftereffects perceptual?

Authors:  Katherine R Storrs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19

9.  Adding years to your life (or at least looking like it): a simple normalization underlies adaptation to facial age.

Authors:  Sean F O'Neil; Amy Mac; Gillian Rhodes; Michael A Webster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evolving concepts of sensory adaptation.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2012-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.